Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?


"xxein" <xxein@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e89317aa-69a6-4420-b8fa-03c31acd8b78@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mar 8, 12:04 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Spirit of Truth wrote:
Let me remind you all, lack of simultaneity as exampled in SR
is obviously false as can be experienced by just about every
human being.

Please describe the last time you experienced simultaneity to the
resolution of a nanosecond.

Then please describe the last time you experienced simultaneity that is
the same between two frames moving at 0.99 c relative to each other.

Bottom line: your assertion is completely baseless, because you have
never experienced ANY of the relevant phenomena. There is no constraint
that the world behaves at other scales in the same way it behaves on the
scales you have experienced, and experiments show that is simply does
not. <shrug>

Thus the basic math used in Lorentz and Relativity is false or
non-applicable to the real Universe.

No, your baseless assertion is non-applicable to the real universe.

Tom Roberts

| xxein: Lorentz and Einstein (SR) are different. Which one is MORE
| real in their "domain of applicability"?

That's like asking which is the better tetrahedron, an apple or an orange?
Geez you stupid ***.



.

Quantcast