Re: ROTFLOL....SRians don't understand SR.

On Mar 6, 10:00 am, "rot...@xxxxxxxxx" <rot...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 3, 1:16 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
certain things we discussed in Newtonian physics that were in fact
known to be lies when they came out of my mouth -- but there is a

lies where? ground? bed?
lie -> lige

It was very clear from the context that the word 'lies' was a noun, not a
verb.

It is surprising you do not know the accepted English meaning of the plural
noun "lies"

I didn't say it wasn't a noun.  

You are wrong again. You did "say" it was a noun. Google kept a
record.  Words have specific meanings depending the context. In our

Learn how to read, cretin. Read my above and take a class on
arithmetic and logic: Two nots in English undo the first not. And
what you said has to do with nothing.

context, the way you used your words and sentences meant that you
believed that "lies" was a noun, which is not the case, it is a
verb.

I beliefd nothing of the ilk. "lies" is either.

You were leading people to believe that you believe that it is a noun.

wrong

Your english is really bad. You might know the words but you do not
know how to use them in context.

How would you know how well I play pool? Your everything is very bad.
.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast