Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?

On Mar 9, 2:15 am, "Bill Hobba" <rubb...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Spirit of Truth" <junehar...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:DzpAj.11894$Mw.10578@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



"Tom Roberts" <tjroberts...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:B7pAj.8205$Mh2.6954@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Spirit of Truth wrote:
Let me remind you all, lack of simultaneity as exampled in SR
is obviously false as can be experienced by just about every
human being.

Please describe the last time you experienced simultaneity to the
resolution of a nanosecond.

Right now.

Since no human being can do that you are obviously speaking rubbish.

Bill

you fool

i have instr and chips doin resolution better than picoseconds

i fok your ass anywhere any time, please ask





Then please describe the last time you experienced simultaneity that is
the same between two frames moving at 0.99 c relative to each other.

Right now.

Bottom line: your assertion is completely baseless, because you have
never experienced ANY of the relevant phenomena. There is no constraint
that the world behaves at other scales in the same way it behaves on the
scales you have experienced, and experiments show that is simply does
not. <shrug>

Not at all. Apparently you are one of those that cannot experience
the obvious.

Thus the basic math used in Lorentz and Relativity is false or
non-applicable to the real Universe.

No, your baseless assertion is non-applicable to the real universe.

Silly. Get in touch with reality.

from: Spirit of Truth

(using June's e-mail to communicate to you)!

Tom Roberts

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: alternative to gettickcount
    ... And how does your VB code know what the CPU clock frequency is on the machine on which it is running, so that it knows how to interpret the result? ... Let's face it, Ulrich, ther is NO WAY that you are going to get a nanosecond resolution out of timing anything on a pc! ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: alternative to gettickcount
    ... VB code timing results in the "sub nanosecond" order, ... Ulrich has claimed he is able to do. ... "The resolution is below one nanosecond. ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: alternative to gettickcount
    ... give you one nanosecond resolution in any meaningful way. ... You need to couple QueryPerformanceCounter with QueryPerformanceFrequency for it to have any real meaning. ... But when QPC was polled in a tight loop, ... involves at least one "travel across the bridge" and which therefore cannot possibly produce a result anywhere near the one nanosecond that you have postulated. ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: utime() vs. utimes()
    ... I get nanosecond mtime resolution on Solaris, for instance, by peeking into the stat struct. ... The Solaris stat structure stores nanosecond resolution; it doesn't matter what the underlying FS can do as long as it's not finer-grained than nanosecond. ...
    (comp.unix.programmer)
  • Re: why I cannot stop this loop at 50 points? (code)
    ... (The system time-of-day clock has subsecond resolution, ... you get less and less than nanosecond ... but you are not forced to divide by 1e9. ... You could use a wider floating type, ...
    (comp.lang.c)