Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- From: stevendaryl3016@xxxxxxxxx (Daryl McCullough)
- Date: 12 Mar 2008 15:47:38 -0700
Ken S. Tucker says...
On Mar 12, 6:12 am, stevendaryl3...@xxxxxxxxx (Daryl McCullough)
wrote:
I'm sure that it's possible to work perfectly well with
complex coordinates.
That's what a (+---) signature is.
No, it's not.
But the notion of a metric "signature"
only makes sense if the coordinates are real.
I don't know what "makes sense" means, but
I prefer to use a (++++) signature BUT that's
choice not a physical law of nature.
But the claim that spacetime has the metric (+---)
(or equivalently) (-+++) *is* a physical fact about
the universe. It's a very important fact, and it
makes for a big difference between spacelike and
timelike separations.
--
Daryl McCullough
Ithaca, NY
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- References:
- invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- From: iuval
- Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- Prev by Date: Re: Will it ever be possible to view an atom?
- Next by Date: Re: scientific rubbish
- Previous by thread: Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- Next by thread: Re: invariance of negative signature of the metric?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|