Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Dono <sa_ge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 14, 7:59 am, "Pmb" <some...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I didn't say that it was. It is a matter of fact that the force is
perpendicular to the velocity.
No, it isn't. I just showed you :
F.v=qv.E
This is a statement of the problem the OP
asked.
No, the OP asked the solution for circular motion in relativity. Eric
Gisse gave a valid solution, you gave a bogus one.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Lady Chacha
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Pmb
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- References:
- Circular motion in SR
- From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Pmb
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Dono
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Pmb
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Dono
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Pmb
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Dono
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Pmb
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Dono
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Pmb
- Circular motion in SR
- Prev by Date: Re: Mach's principle and aether
- Next by Date: Re: Circular motion in SR
- Previous by thread: Re: Circular motion in SR
- Next by thread: Re: Circular motion in SR
- Index(es):