Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 14, 12:32 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 14, 12:04 pm, Dono <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 14, 11:58 am, "Pmb" <some...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That is not the case. We disagree about what is necessary and sufficient
conditions (From Dono's posts he does not appear to be a physicist .. or if
so then he's not a very good one)
Pete
HaHaha, this is a good one, Pete
Make sure you understand what you've been taught today. I know it is a
little complicated but, with patience, you'll get it. Eventulally.
Hey Donut, just for fun, you take Gisse,
(aka Colonel Klink) and I'll backstop
PMB, and go toe to toe in physics .
Excellent. Why not have PMB review your paper and my assertions and
see what he says?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/973af37a9af16ebf?dmode=source
IMO, PMB is real sharp in 4d tensors,
he's a 4D shasher.
Hey PMB, light humor, I'm stationed!
Ken
.
- References:
- Circular motion in SR
- From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Pmb
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Dono
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Pmb
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Dono
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Dono
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Albertito
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Pmb
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Dono
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Circular motion in SR
- Prev by Date: Re: Circular motion in SR
- Next by Date: Re: How long can they keep this up?
- Previous by thread: Re: Circular motion in SR
- Next by thread: Re: Circular motion in SR
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|