Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 15, 5:51 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 15, 11:25 am, "Sue..." <suzysewns...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 14, 2:14 pm, Albertito <albertito1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why can't longitudinal EM waves exist in vacuum?
Because Maxwell's equations do not predict them
for vacuum? If it is so, then Maxwell's equations are
incomplete, they should be generalized. Longitudinal
EM waves in vacuum generate what is known as
gravity!!!!!
You are close. What Maxwell's equations can't
predict is a third axis of freedom.
Agreed. For a quicky, let me use ExB=C
in a g-field where "C" is the velocity
of light in g-field, "c" is a constant
velocity of light in the absence of any
field effects, then c = C + delta C.
I'd consider the "delta C" to be associated
with a longitudinal EM wave as conjecture,
to be considered.
Hey Sue, did you enjoy that quicky?
Ken S. Tucker
[snip rest in agreement]
I am quite accustomed to posters to this ng
that carry their brains between their legs but
you are the only one that swaps organs from
both ends of the torso to keep things in balance. :o)
Ahhh... no I don't enjoy that any more than
a stalemate with Carlip about curving
light particles.
I can't see any connection with what may as
well be refraction in solar plasma and:
<< It can be seen from these equations that,
in the absence of current and charge, the
solutions are potentials which propagate at
the speed of light.
The Lorenz gauge is incomplete in the sense
that there remains a subspace of gauge transformations
which preserve the constraint. These remaining
degrees of freedom correspond to gauge functions
which satisfy the wave equation... >>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%9E_gauge#Lorenz_gauge
Your capital "C" is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shapiro_effect ?
No mention of corrections for solar plasma so
it is hard, for me at least, to attribute any
of that to an interaction between light and
gravity.
I am more with the OP. Light IS gravity,
(or the cohering signal for its ensembles)
so it doesn't interact with itself.
Sue...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- References:
- The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- From: Albertito
- Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- From: Albertito
- Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- From: Albertito
- Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- From: Albertito
- Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- From: Igor
- Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- From: Albertito
- Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- From: Sue...
- Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- Prev by Date: Re: why relativists believe only that they get served through the tube?
- Next by Date: Re: Circular motion in SR
- Previous by thread: Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- Next by thread: Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|