Re: The secret quantum kernel of relativity



On Mar 19, 4:31 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 19, 11:59 am, "Sue..." <suzysewns...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Mar 16, 10:57 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]

Careful now. It the theory correctly predicted
presence of the plasma because it represents
an increase of the density of energy to
the stress energy tensor then you might sell
the theory short.

Ok, you be careful to, how does the plasma
theory predict the perihelion advance?

<< The theory of General Relativity explaines the advance
of Mercury perihelion using space curvature and the
Schwartzschild metric. We demonstrate that this
phenomena can also be interpreted due to the
cogravitational field produced by the apparent
motion of the Sun around Mercury giving exactly
the same estimate as derived from the Schwartzschild
metric in general relativity theory. This is a
surprising result because the estimate from both
theoretical approaches match exactly the measured value.
The discussion and implications of this result is
out of the scope of the present work. >>http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0005040

That seems to suggest that any theory which includes
a retarded potential for the speed of light would
predict Mercury's advance. There is a good illustration
on page 9 of the 74KB pdf if you need to justify
the download to the Dialup-Police. :o)

Sue...

Another effect that is (IMO) a GR effect
is the quantization of electronic atomic
orbits, in that, GR provides a firm basis
for the otherwise adhoc Quantum Theory.

That is solar system atoms.

No, the atoms that make up your body.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hi Sue.
Let P = P_0/sqrt(g_00).
Find dP/dr, let's see what you get.

I'll get stuck in the goo trying to do that.
But you might see it with the covers off here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_tensor
http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath567/kmath567.htm

It tastes like photons. I don't buy two left
gloves so I can use one inside-out and I don't
go out my way to think with photons.


If you give Mercury a shove, it won't wait
'till it hears from the Sun to shove back.

This ?might? be a correct description of the space
surrounding each object:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5c/Gravwav.gif/150px-Gravwav.gif
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity#Gravitational_waves

But there are other terms that can describe the space
that result in a cross-check rather than a briefer
catechism pointing back to the same empty mechanism.


<< apart from the arbitrariness governed by the
free choice of coordinates, the
gm v -field shall be completely determined
by the matter. Mach's stipulation is favoured
in general relativity by the circumstance
that acceleration induction in accordance
with the gravitational field equations really
exists, >> _-A.Einstein
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1921/einstein-lecture.html

It conceals too much. There is no reason to tune equations
so they will fit on the back of an envelope when tube
commuters have super-computers around their neck
playing their favorite tunes and calculating a
GPS pseudorange between beats of the music. :o)

http://www.research.ibm.com/grape/grape_ewald.htm

<< Studies of coherent matter waves and Bose-Einstein
condensation are now an important and growing part
of atomic, molecular and optical physics around the
world. These investigations are giving us new insights
into the nature of coherent assemblies of ultra-cold
atoms. These mesoscopic systems, newly available in
the laboratory, are accessible to first principles
theory, making them a superb test ground for many-body
physics. Articles in this issue show how this has
driven the development of new quantitative techniques
for the finite temperature quantum fields needed to
represent trapped and partially condensed gases.
The fact that condensates are trapped and inhomogeneous
means one has to deal with matters glossed over in
the homogeneous case. A good example is the scale
lengths relevant for vortex formation that can be
comparable to the size of the whole condensate. The
dynamics of formation and evolution of these features,
as well as many others, can also be accessed directly
in real time. The ability to manipulate directly the
state of a condensed gas has enabled experimentalists
to perform an extraordinary range of observations of
the many-body dynamics of condensates. The fact that
the interactions between the particle are tuneable,
using external fields, adds enormously to the range
of issues we shall see explored in the next few years.
In the years to come, I expect us to see a yet wider
range of studies where molecular systems play an
increasing role. The coupling of controlled radiation
and matter wave fields will also, I am sure, produce
broad new avenues for new investigations. The subject
has brought together physicists from atomic and optical
physics with others from different areas; in particular
condensed matter physics. Indeed, this cross-fertilisation
has been a real treat for those of us involved in the field.
It is difficult not be excited about the possibilities
for this rapidly advancing field! >>
--Keith Burnett Honorary Editor, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.
http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0953-4075/33/19/001



<< The interaction energy between two dissimilar non-ionized
molecules or atoms is calculated in fourth-order perturbation
theory and dipole approximation. The interaction Hamiltonian
involves the charge distribution with the complete Maxwell
field and not only the Coulomb interaction between charges.
At close separations between the two systems (still large
compared with molecular diameters) the interaction energy
is of course that corresponding to the London force. However,
for separations large compared with the characteristic
wavelengths associated with transitions within the molecules
the London force is modified considerably. In the case of two
molecules in the ground state this modification was first found
by Casimir & Polder. If one of the molecules is in an excited
state new effects appear at these large distances. The energy
of interaction depends on the orientation of the transition moment
in the excited molecule with respect to the vector displacement
between the two systems. In both transverse and longitudinal
orientations the potential law is considerably stronger than the
R-7 of the ground state-ground state interaction. For transverse
orientations there is an unmodulated R-2 energy dependence
which though very weak individually could give rise to considerable
effects when the excited molecule is in a macroscopic
environment. >>
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1965RSPSA.286..573M

Sue...

Regards
Ken S. Tucker-







.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: A UNIFIED UNIVERSE
    ... One could say he was attempting to describe the whole universe in one ... The interaction energy between two dissimilar non-ionized ... molecules or atoms is calculated in fourth-order perturbation ... violate no well accepted laws of physics. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: No Grace Period for Metabolism Either
    ... I don't expect any life without the sun (or other source of energy). ... What if the chances for 'sponanious creation' of selfreplicating molecules ... >>I expect that the spot where this first happened had a good environment ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
    ... other than the random motion of air molecules. ... but not before losing the energy deposited on the other plate due ... Second Law states that, furthermore, you can't break even. ... reducing the temperature of the liquid. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Sentience
    ... If it is always certain where the molecules will ... to influence the flow of molecules in our brain, ... the molecules in our brain into specific states we need energy to do so. ... some ultra intelligent computers exist there are ways to come closer to ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: What did the first single-celled organisms eat?
    ... No, seriously, they had to have some source of energy and carbon. ... molecules, some of whose energy can be extracted. ... Original organisms probably evolved as a community that was overall ... If you have a lysed membrane ...
    (talk.origins)