Re: Circular motion in SR

On Mar 20, 4:04�pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 20, 10:09 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:



What is S? What is S'? Why do you expect people to divine your hidden
assumptions?

Well, I have explained to you at least three times what S and S' are,
and you still pretend you do not know, or else you are not
pretending. S is a set of coordinates at rest. S' is a set of
coordinates in motion relative to S.

�As
you should have learned in school, x and t are variables.

No ***. I'm asking you to be explicit in the meaning.

x is a coordinate in S, t is time in S. Let me know if I am going too
fast for you.

�They can be
any values. �According to Isaac Newton, v=30 miles per second means
that 2(pi)R/T = 30 miles per second. �S and S' are frames of
reference. �S' is moving with a velocity of 30 miles per second
relative to S.

Holy cluelessness batman. You cannot compare two noninertial frames in
SR like that.

Who said I was comparing anything in SR? I do not even believe SR. I
was comparing two frames of reference, S and S'. I threw in the
definition by Isaac Newton to get you excited. S' could be moving
with a velocity of 30 miles per second in a straight line relative to
S if that is the only way you could understand S' to be moving. Think
of it this way, if you make R in Isaac Newton's equation infinitely
long, you would not be able to distinguish between S' moving in a
straight line relative to S or S' moving in a curved line relative to
S with a radius of R like Mr. Newton's equation shows. Either way I
am going to compare the two frames of reference whether you like it or
not.

� � �It seems to me that with all of the schooling you have had, you
should be able so figure some of this out for yourself.
Robert B. Winn

I'm not the crank trying to manipulate symbols he does not understand.- Hide quoted text -

Well, good luck in your government job.
Robert B. Winn
.

Quantcast