Re: Circular motion in SR

On Mar 19, 11:13 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 19, 3:32�am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 18, 10:24�am, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Does it not occur to you that removing one mistake in what you are
saying does not substantially change the value of what you are saying
if the remainder is just as bad? Does it not occur to you that
removing one napkinfull of coffeegrounds from a overflowing trash bin
does not make the remainder worthy of reinspection?>�No responses since that time except ones like yours
which contain no mathematics, whatsoever. �I think you are correct.
Scientists have contributed about all they are ever going to
contribute to this conversation.

Well, I keep an open mind.  I have never seen anything presented as
proof of a distance contraction that I could not disprove with the
equations I use.
Robert B. Winn

You are not disproving anything. You are simply saying, well, you
obviously haven't followed my recommended procedure of abandoning a
local physical reference as the standard for length and using a
preferred-frame reference to redefine all your lengths for you, and
that way the Galilean transforms would be preserved.

Sorry, that doesn't seem compelling.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Circular motion in SR
    ... saying does not substantially change the value of what you are saying ... if the remainder is just as bad? ... Tell me, when you find your checking account doesn't balance, do you ... alter the balance by trial and error until the account balances? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Circular motion in SR
    ... saying does not substantially change the value of what you are saying ... if the remainder is just as bad? ... preferred-frame reference to redefine all your lengths for you, ...     But after a few trial and error corrections, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Circular motion in SR
    ... saying does not substantially change the value of what you are saying ... if the remainder is just as bad? ... proof of a distance contraction that I could not disprove with the ... preferred-frame reference to redefine all your lengths for you, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Circular motion in SR
    ... saying does not substantially change the value of what you are saying ... if the remainder is just as bad? ... proof of a distance contraction that I could not disprove with the ... But they couldn't get the distance correct because they had that ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Circular motion in SR
    ... saying does not substantially change the value of what you are saying ... if the remainder is just as bad? ... proof of a distance contraction that I could not disprove with the ... But they couldn't get the distance correct because they had that ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Loading