Re: What is Proper Time?

In sci.physics.relativity, Androcles
<Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:56:18 GMT
<6ktFj.96718$nw4.12807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:trhhb5-f24.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| In sci.physics.relativity, Androcles
| <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| wrote
| on Sun, 23 Mar 2008 05:33:35 GMT
| <PYlFj.312648$3m6.3663@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
| >
| > "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
| > news:fk3hb5-ca5.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | In sci.physics.relativity, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson)
| > | <HW@>
| > | wrote
| > | on Sun, 23 Mar 2008 02:56:48 GMT
| > | <57hbu3d0ceeufiq3gc26nlqlnqv1gu4oi4@xxxxxxx>:
| > | > On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 10:00:23 -0700, The Ghost In The Machine
| > | > <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| > | >
| > | >>In sci.physics.relativity, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson)
| > | >><HW@>
| > | >> wrote
| > | >
| > | >>>>I take it frequency does not change, then. Very well; your system
is
| > | >>>>compatible with Androcles'.
| > | >>>
| > | >>> Please never say that.
| > | >>
| > | >>Why? Your system is perfectly compatible with Androcles if both are
| > | >>positing invariant frequency.
| > | >>
| > | >>> However it is likely that if and when a photon changes length,
| > | >>> its intrinsic frequency also changes.
| > | >>
| > | >>It is *REQUIRED* if the photon does not change speed. This is
because
| > | >>speed = wavelength * frequency.
| > | >
| > | > That's according to classical wave theory.
| > | > It doesn't apply to light, which is particulate and ballistic.
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >>>>> Any large mass has an accompanying 'EM control sphere' around it
| > | >>>>
| > | >>>>And the size of this sphere is ... ?
| > | >>>
| > | >>> I haven't looked into that.
| > | >>
| > | >>You should. Ideally, one would express the sphere using a
| > | >>combination of mass and star luminosity. If necessary,
| > | >>one might include the spin, motion, and radiation
| > | >>flux/wavelength (or frequency) as well. It may also not
| > | >>be quite a sphere; the Earth, after all, is an oblate spheroid
| > | >>(a "squashed ball").
| > | >
| > | > Moreso in the case of close binary pairs....
| > | >
| > |
| > | Close binary pairs introduce further distortions.
| >
| > There are none. Whilst binaries DO exist (Sirius, for example), close
| > binaries cannot.
| > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
| > Basic physics.
| >
|
| So Algol is a single star with a massive planet. Very good.

Yes, and I am the discoverer. The planet is called 'Androcles'.
Delta-Cepheus is also a single star with a massive planet, very good.
The planet is named "Cassandra".

OK. You'll want to publish your findings in a good peer-reviewed
journal. I'd also contact reputable scientific news sources.
This is, after all, an important discovery worthy of widespread
adulation, the solution to the Demon Star that has perplexed scientists
for millennia. Scientists from all over the world will of course want
to exhume and reinterpret such things as spectroscopic data.

http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/383195
and
http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0401583

in particular will have to be explained somehow.
The explanation stinks, of course, since there is no
Algol B, but somehow the instrument is detecting an odd
Doppler shift.

http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/375837

also assumes an Algol B, attempting to explain various spectral
anomalies related to C and N lines.

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1968SvA....11..828G

starts out entirely wrong, but shows some interesting
graphs on page 830. These graphs show shifts in the
spectra caused by the Planet Androcles in its orbit.

As you can see, the mainstream scientific media are
entirely on the wrong track for some reason. Expect
resistance.


| You now get to determine/calculate the mass of the star
| and the planet, cross-correlate it with known stellar
| characteristics (stars of certain masses have certain
| spectra), and parallax measurements.
|
| Or not, as the spirit moves you. But don't expect us to do
| your homework.

I do not expect a resentful useless crank like you to do anything.
The "time" required by light to travel from hadron A to hadron B
equals the "time" it requires to travel from hadron B to hadron A'

NO IT DOESN'T. Not if the TWLS observed by a third party, moving
with respect to the experiment.

because "the velocity of light in your theory plays the part, physically,
of an infinitely great velocity."
You now get to determine/calculate the masses of the hadrons.
Or not, as the spirit moves you, but don't expect me to do your
homework, crank.


The hadrons have a mass of 1.672621637 * 10^-27 kg or 938.272013 MeV,
according to conventional scientific thought.

--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows. Multi-platform(1), multi-tasking(1), multi-user(1).
(1) if one defines "multi" as "exactly one".

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.

Relevant Pages