Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
- From: "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Juan.
On Mar 24, 4:14 am, "Juan R." González-Álvarez
<juan...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ken S. Tucker wrote on Sun, 23 Mar 2008 09:57:56 -0700:http://motls.blogspot.com/2007/03/steven-weinberg-vs-weird-physicists...
One of conditions of GR *connections* is precisely g_ab = g_ba, which
does not hold for particles rotating around.
The connection is not g obviously, correct it like
"One of conditions of GR *connections* is precisely gamma_ab =
gamma_ba, which does not hold for particles rotating around."
The thing that buggered up Einstein (and Moffat) was the use of the
nonsymmetrical *connection*, they are a serious problem.
What I use is nonsymmetrical metrics with symmetric connections, which
is quite beautiful. Regards
Ken S. Tucker
Hi Ken,
It seems that Steven Weinberg also rejects to consider nonsymmetrical
gammas as something fundamental:
I think the reasoning was that a NonSymmetrical
metric required a NS Christoffel, and that NSC,
has been a bitch for Einsteins team and also
Dr. Moffats. Dr. Moffat came to our place for
dinner, and did express a frustation with NSC's,
that I shared. So what I/we did is made the NSC
vanish.
To cover my ass I did a brief post on how to do
that in another thread (NS Christoffels's), and
still use the NS metric.
Weinberg and Yablon are focused on 5D, that's
fine, that's choice. I feel confident to be
able to transform a 4D + 1 compact D to a
a NS 4D. Neither is right or wrong, IMO.
I favor the development of 5D because Yablon
and Weinberg see that as the easiest math to
use inside sub-atomic particles, so the "NS's"
above are an adjunct to 5D.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
- References:
- Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
- From: Jay R. Yablon
- Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
- From: Juan R.
- Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
- Prev by Date: Re: Circular motion in SR
- Next by Date: Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
- Previous by thread: Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
- Next by thread: Re: Query about non-symmetric energy tensors
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|