Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Jerry <Cephalobus_alienus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 04:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 25, 6:38 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 24, 11:53�am, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you're talking about the Mars probe that was
lost, this is known because we have the e-mail
record going back and forth between NASA and
the contractor.
You're saying that NASA admitting they lost a
multi-million dollar probe because of not checking
units is something they would make up to get more
funding? How, in your mind, would that work?
� � � � � � - Randy
We were so close, and human error caused the crash. Next time we will
use a computer.
Robert B. Winn
We -did- use a computer. The software was programmed incorrectly.
Jerry
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- References:
- Circular motion in SR
- From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: PD
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: PD
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: PD
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: PD
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Circular motion in SR
- From: rbwinn
- Circular motion in SR
- Prev by Date: Re: Circular motion in SR
- Next by Date: Re: Paradoxes
- Previous by thread: Re: Circular motion in SR
- Next by thread: Re: Circular motion in SR
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|