Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity

On Mar 25, 10:45 am, "rot...@xxxxxxxxx" wrote:
On Mar 25, 1:24 pm, Albertito wrote:

The relativity of simultaneity as explained in
SR is the greatest farce ever. The claim that
simultaneity is not absolute, but dependent on
the observer, is the biggest lie perpetrated on
science.

If you want to discuss SR's "simultaneity" then use *its* definitions;
do not use your definition (your concept).

SR defines "time" and "simultaneity" in a specific way. When you use
SR's definitions, SR *implies* that two events which are simultaneous
for an observer will not be simul. for another (moving) observer.

"Read the Holy scripture", says the priest.

"Only we priests can interpret the Holy scriptures. You have no hope
of understanding them."

"Trust us."

SR represents the ultimate BS with the content of religious faith.
Relative simultaneity cannot be interpreted by SR. Relative
simultaneity is the manifestation of the Lorentz transform only and
only through the very combination of the principle of relativity and
time dilation. Relative simultaneity because of mutually equal amount
in time dilation cannot allow any event to be pin-pointed in an
absolute time line. Well, the Michelson-Morley experiment proves
relative simultaneity WRONG. Any interferometer allows any photon in
the interference to be back-tracked in time to show where it was every
time. For more than 100 years, the physicists are still swimming in
excrement. <shrug>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The relativity of simultaneity
    ... Would you like to talk about what SR says, Seto? ... simultaneous for one observer then they must be simultaneous for every ... He determined that the strikes occurred at equal distance away from ... Yes with the provision that this simultaneity is observer independent. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • The farce of relativity of simultaneity
    ... simultaneity is not absolute, but dependent on ... the observer, is the biggest lie perpetrated on ... in the universe are existing in absolute simultaneous ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
    ... These are called physicists. ... ***{They are surely relativists. ... An observer is standing on the ... establish the relativism of simultaneity. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The Non-Relativity of Simultaneity
    ... An observer is standing on the ... The question asked by relativists is whether it is ... establish the relativism of simultaneity. ... "Events which are simultaneous with reference to the embankment are not ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: relatively confusing
    ... ofcourse you will say simultaneity is a relative thing..but... ... and B also correspond to positions A and B on the train. ... the flashes 1 of lightning occur, ... Hence the observer will see the beam of light emitted from B ...
    (sci.physics)