Re: why relativists think that information can be destroyed?

On Mar 25, 12:03 pm, Igor <thoov...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 24, 8:08 pm,xxein<xx...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Mar 24, 12:43 pm, Igor <thoov...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 24, 5:06 am, tici viracocha <q2k...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

fat rats in big cars pretend understanding
by not understanding

what they actually want is that twey want you
to understand that thay understand by not
understandin

than they want you by forcing you to also
pretend that you understand by dont
understanding

similarily, you cant create, destroy and transfer
faster than speed of light matter, energy or informTION

therfore consequently, accordin to thay,
info cannot be destroyed, whicha has enormous
implicTION in knowen physics and stuff, which
is complitly wrong, you need ta start from tha begining

and also cacordingly, info from your foken brain
can nevar be destroyed, which remains stored
imaginary hypherspherically, but now without bein
bounded by growth depth deficit  [Hammond 2007],

so she growths now freely

A mind is a horrible thing to develop...alone.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

xxein:  So?  There is still only one physic.  Can you find it without
going along with the herd?

Let me guess.  You must be one of *** Cheney's relatives.  He likes
using that word too.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

xxein: Geez! You miss the point by floating with the herd.

You don't know the physic. Nobody knows. So what is it you DO know?
.

Quantcast