Re: time intervals

On Mar 29, 2:14�pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 29, 10:17�am, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]

This relates to the Galilean transformation equations in the following
way.

� � � � � � � � � � x'=x-vt
� � � � � � � � � � cn'=ct-vt
� � � � � � � � � � � n'= t(1-v/c)

There is no "c" in Galilean transformations.

There is no "n" in Galilean transformations.

There is if I put them there.
Robert B. Winn

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Principle of equivalence
    ... Robert B. Winn ... Now make the obvious conclusion that the Galilean transformations are ... Well, I am really sorry about what I did to scientific time, Eric. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: time intervals
    ... Robert B. Winn ... that clock was t' the way scientists of today do. ... not use the Galilean transformations except as approximations. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Principle of equivalence
    ... Robert B. Winn ... Now make the obvious conclusion that the Galilean transformations are ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: time intervals
    ... Robert B. Winn ... Not Galilean transformations, they are shit you made up.- Hide quoted text - ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: time intervals
    ... Robert B. Winn ... Not Galilean transformations, they are shit you made up. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)