sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: Smooth John
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The correct Doppler formula falsifies relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The correct Doppler formula falsifies relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: Smooth John
• Re: The correct Doppler formula falsifies relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The correct Doppler formula falsifies relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The correct Doppler formula falsifies relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: The correct Doppler formula falsifies relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: OG
• Re: The correct Doppler formula falsifies relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: kp
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The correct Doppler formula falsifies relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: YBM
• The correct Doppler formula falsifies relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Question about Gaussian Intergal Underlying the "Central Identity of Quantum Field Theory"
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: kp
• Re: A simple derivation of the relativistic formula for the addition of velocities
  • From: YBM
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: A simple derivation of the relativistic formula for the addition of velocities
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: A simple derivation of the relativistic formula for the addition of velocities
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Contraction re-interpretation or misrepresentation?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Esab
• A simple derivation of the relativistic formula for the addition of velocities
  • From: YBM
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: dlzc
• Re: On the controversy of physics
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: kp
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Looking for examples of Physically-Meaningful, Non-Gaussian Wavefunctions
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Time dilation scenarios
  • From: matscienceman
• Woodfold Shutters: Beautify Your Home
  • From: liukaiyuan
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On the controversy of physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation scenarios
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: On the controversy of physics
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• fluid dynamics made simple
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: kp
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: kp
• Re: Looking for examples of Physically-Meaningful, Non-Gaussian Wavefunctions
  • From: kp
• why three dimensions?
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Seminars on New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Basti05b
• Looking for examples of Physically-Meaningful, Non-Gaussian Wavefunctions
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: On the controversy of physics
  • From: Surfer
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time dilation scenarios
  • From: matscienceman
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: On the controversy of physics
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction re-interpretation or misrepresentation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction re-interpretation or misrepresentation?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Time dilation scenarios
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: YBM
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: kp
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: OG
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: kp
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: kp
• Re: Time dilation scenarios
  • From: matscienceman
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: kp
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: kp
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: kp
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: kp
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: kp
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: On the controversy of physics
  • From: Mike
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: bz
• Re: On the controversy of physics
  • From: andrewgeorges93
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: The formula E = m c^2
  • From: Igor
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: On the controversy of physics
  • From: Surfer
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: kp
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: kp
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Androcles
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Dono
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Does SR transform to Ballistic theory1
  • From: Dono
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Esab
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: hagman
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: kp
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Does SR transform to Ballistic theory1
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: SolomonW
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: kp
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: kp
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Basti05b
• A letter from a professor
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: On the controversy of physics
  • From: Dono
• Re: On the controversy of physics
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Alen
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Time dilation scenarios
  • From: matscienceman
• Need help in Calculating Wavefunction Variance
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: bz
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: kp
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: On the controversy of physics
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Contraction re-interpretation or misrepresentation?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: On the controversy of physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Contraction re-interpretation or misrepresentation?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Eric Gisse
• CODATA's Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant R_H
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: On the controversy of physics
  • From: PD
• Re: The formula E = m c^2
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: The formula E = m c^2
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: The formula E = m c^2
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: another cat paradox???
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The formula E = m c^2
  • From: Igor
• Re: Relativistic network of velocities mapped through electrical circuits
  • From: Dono
• Re: On the controversy of physics
  • From: Dono
• Re: Comment on Weyl's Gauge.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Does SR transform to Ballistic theory1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On the controversy of physics
  • From: Surfer
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Does SR transform to Ballistic theory1
  • From: harry
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativistic network of velocities mapped through electrical circuits
  • From: Albertito
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Relativistic network of velocities mapped through electrical circuits
  • From: Dono
• Re: time dilation
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• Relativistic network of velocities mapped through electrical circuits
  • From: Albertito
• Re: On the controversy of physics
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The formula E = m c^2
  • From: Dono
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Esab
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Dono
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Dono
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Alen
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: kp
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: The formula E = m c^2
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Androcles
• Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On the controversy of physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The formula E = m c^2
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The formula E = m c^2
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: love to show off in front of their webcams.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Dono
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: YBM
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Inertia
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: YBM
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: love to show off in front of their webcams.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The formula E = m c^2
  • From: Dono
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Query on Heisenberg Uncertainty, Dirac Spinors, and Fermions "At Rest"
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• The formula E = m c^2
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: MAGNETIC MONOPOLE RADIATION is the origin of the Aharonov Bohm effect.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Comment on Weyl's Gauge.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Comment on Weyl's Gauge.
  • From: Igor
• Re: !!Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: !!Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Comment on Weyl's Gauge.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: OG
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: OG
• love to show off in front of their webcams.
  • From: lucienhed
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• On the controversy of physics
  • From: babaluyee
• Re: Does SR transform to Ballistic theory1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Contraction re-interpretation or misrepresentation?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: !!Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: JanPB
• !!Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Androcles
• Is the known universe open inside out?
  • From: Smooth John
• Re: How does a typical place of universe treats electromagnetic radiation?
  • From: Smooth John
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• How does a typical place of universe treats electromagnetic radiation?
  • From: Smooth John
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Query on Heisenberg Uncertainty, Dirac Spinors, and Fermions "At Rest"
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Who impose me a causality in only one direction?
  • From: Smooth John
• Re: Who impose me a causality in only one direction?
  • From: Smooth John
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Comment on Weyl's Gauge.
  • From: Igor
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Who impose me a causality in only one direction?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Who impose me a causality in only one direction?
  • From: SolomonW
• Who impose me a causality in only one direction?
  • From: Smooth John
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Smooth John
• "Gravity"
  • From: Sreb
• Re: Does SR transform to Ballistic theory1
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Does GR predict gravitational pre-deflections and Shapiro pre-delays of light?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Contraction re-interpretation or misrepresentation?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction re-interpretation or misrepresentation?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• manual solution solution manual study guide
  • From: sms123
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inertia
  • From: xxein
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Androcles
• big bang
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Contraction re-interpretation or misrepresentation?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: doug
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: doug
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: OG
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: OG
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: YBM
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: OG
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: OG
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: OG
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: YBM
• Re: A Riddle for Relativists.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: vanep
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: mL
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: OG
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: OG
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Comment on Weyl's Gauge.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: sci.physics.relativity charter
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Comment on Weyl's Gauge.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Comment on Weyl's Gauge.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Comment on Weyl's Gauge.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Comment on Weyl's Gauge.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Comment on Weyl's Gauge.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: sci.physics.relativity charter
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins Corp...
  • From: mabusdavid
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Does SR transform to Ballistic theory1
  • From: Dono
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Sreb
• Re: Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: rbwinn
• Was Einstein a fake?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Does SR transform to Ballistic theory1
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Comment on Weyl's Gauge.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Androcles
• Does GR predict gravitational pre-deflections and Shapiro pre-delays of light?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Comment on Weyl's Gauge.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON OPTICAL SUPERCOMPUTING (OSC'08): Deadline extension
  • From: laura
• Re: Inertia
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Does SR transform to Ballistic theory1
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Inertia
  • From: xxein
• Re: Note on Kronecker delta (kst).
  • From: xxein
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: philneo2001
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Dono
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: kp
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Does SR transform to Ballistic theory1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does SR transform to Ballistic theory1
  • From: Dono
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: OG
• Re: Does SR transform to Ballistic theory1
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does SR transform to Ballistic theory1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Does SR transform to Ballistic theory1
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Dono
• Re: time dilation
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: another cat paradox???
  • From: PD
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: PD
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Sreb
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The spinor nature of spacetime - Why is SR wrong? Three time coordinates needed
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Jerry
• Re: time dilation
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: another cat paradox???
  • From: Androcles
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: another cat paradox???
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Dono
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Dono
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: time dilation
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Jerry
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: OG
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: OG
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: another cat paradox???
  • From: physicsbreak
• Re: another cat paradox???
  • From: physicsbreak
• Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty and Schwinger Anomaly: Two Sides of the Same Coin?
  • From: kp
• Re: Problem: The relativistic golden ratio
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty and Schwinger Anomaly: Two Sides of the Same Coin?
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: blackhead
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: another cat paradox???
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty and Schwinger Anomaly: Two Sides of the Same Coin?
  • From: kp
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty and Schwinger Anomaly: Two Sides of the Same Coin?
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty and Schwinger Anomaly: Two Sides of the Same Coin?
  • From: kp
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: PD
• Re: Trying to straighten out factors of i in Heisenberg relationships
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Trying to straighten out factors of i in Heisenberg relationships
  • From: kp
• Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty and Schwinger Anomaly: Two Sides of the Same Coin?
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Problem: The relativistic golden ratio
  • From: Albertito
• Re: another cat paradox???
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: Trying to straighten out factors of i in Heisenberg relationships
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Trying to straighten out factors of i in Heisenberg relationships
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Problem: The relativistic golden ratio
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Trying to straighten out factors of i in Heisenberg relationships
  • From: kp
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Trying to straighten out factors of i in Heisenberg relationships
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Trying to straighten out factors of i in Heisenberg relationships
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Problem: The relativistic golden ratio
  • From: Albertito
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Problem: The relativistic golden ratio
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Dono
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Sreb
• Re: Problem: The relativistic golden ratio
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Problem: The relativistic golden ratio
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Problem: The relativistic golden ratio
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty and Schwinger Anomaly: Two Sides of the Same Coin?
  • From: kp
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Problem: The relativistic golden ratio
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Problem: The relativistic golden ratio
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Problem: The relativistic golden ratio
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Problem: The relativistic golden ratio
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Problem: The relativistic golden ratio
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Trying to straighten out factors of i in Heisenberg relationships
  • From: kp
• Re: another cat paradox???
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MAGNETIC MONOPOLE RADIATION is the origin of the Aharonov Bohm effect.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravitational Doppler
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Heisenberg Uncertainty and Schwinger Anomaly: Two Sides of the Same Coin?
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Entropy. / My opinion /.
  • From: socratus
• Re: another cat paradox???
  • From: physicsbreak
• Re: another cat paradox???
  • From: physicsbreak
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: another cat paradox???
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Trying to straighten out factors of i in Heisenberg relationships
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Trying to straighten out factors of i in Heisenberg relationships
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: another cat paradox???
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: PRIVATE FUSION 1
  • From: xxein
• Re: PRIVATE FUSION 1
  • From: Mike
• Re: Explaining "dark energy".
  • From: dwhig265
• another cat paradox???
  • From: physicsbreak
• Re: Explaining "dark energy".
  • From: dlzc
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Explaining "dark energy".
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Explaining "dark energy".
  • From: dlzc
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Explaining "dark energy".
  • From: dwhig265
• Explaining "dark energy".
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: PRIVATE FUSION 1
  • From: Dono
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Pmb
• PRIVATE FUSION 1
  • From: karamihas
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Dono
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Dono
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: kp
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Surfer
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Pmb
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Mike
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Mike
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Mike
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Mike
• Re: Why do you post here?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Eric Gisse
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Sreb
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Mike
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Mike
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Jerry
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: OG
• MAGNETIC MONOPOLE RADIATION is the origin of the Aharonov Bohm effect.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Mike
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: kp
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Relativity Foud- A profound new function as big as e=mc^2
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Dono
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Dono
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Igor
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: Can the Magnetic Moment Anomaly be Explained based on the Heisenberg Inequality?
  • From: kp
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: Can the Magnetic Moment Anomaly be Explained based on the Heisenberg Inequality?
  • From: kp
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Why do you post here?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Can the Magnetic Moment Anomaly be Explained based on the Heisenberg Inequality?
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Why do you post here?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can the Magnetic Moment Anomaly be Explained based on the Heisenberg Inequality?
  • From: kp
• Re: Addition of distances in Einstein's world: A universal relativistic horizon
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Mike
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Addition of distances in Einstein's world: A universal relativistic horizon
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Why do you post here?
  • From: Dono
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Addition of distances in Einstein's world: A universal relativistic horizon
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: Addition of distances in Einstein's world: A universal relativistic horizon
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Why do you post here?
  • From: PD
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Dono
• Re: Why do you post here?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Addition of distances in Einstein's world: A universal relativistic horizon
  • From: Dono
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Sreb
• Re: Addition of distances in Einstein's world: A universal relativistic horizon
  • From: Albertito
• Can the Magnetic Moment Anomaly be Explained based on the Heisenberg Inequality?
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: harry
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Addition of distances in Einstein's world: A universal relativistic horizon
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Addition of distances in Einstein's world: A universal relativistic horizon
  • From: Dono
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Addition of distances in Einstein's world: A universal relativistic horizon
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Addition of distances in Einstein's world: A universal relativistic horizon
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Mike
• Einstein@home post processing of LIGO S4 data
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: jem
• Re: Addition of distances in Einstein's world: A universal relativistic horizon
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: PD
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: PD
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: harry
• Re: Addition of distances in Einstein's world: A universal relativistic horizon
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Addition of distances in Einstein's world: A universal relativistic horizon
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Entropy. / My opinion /.
  • From: socratus
• Addition of distances in Einstein's world: A universal relativistic horizon
  • From: Albertito
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simultaneity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Slim light box--http://www.edlite.hk
  • From: jenny
• Slim light box--http://www.edlite.hk
  • From: jenny
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: sci.physics.relativity charter
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: YBM
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Pmb
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: PD
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: PD
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• sci.physics.relativity charter
  • From: moderator
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Dono
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: OG
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Mike
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Why do you post here?
  • From: T-minus108
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: PD
• Re: Why do you post here?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Why do you post here?
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: Why do you post here?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: Why do you post here?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why do you post here?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Traveler
• Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS 8
  • From: Dono
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Why do you post here?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: PD
• Re: Why do you post here?
  • From: PD
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Why do you post here?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Why do you post here?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Why do you post here?
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Ciit
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS 8
  • From: Mike
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: PD
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: PD
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: tussock
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time..... If we could we would? (or at least they would tell us)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: Albertito
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• PRIVATE PHYSICS 8
  • From: karamihas
• Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time..... If we could we would? (or at least they would tell us)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Transverse paradox parallel question
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time..... If we could we would? (or at least they would tell us)
  • From: Jason Needham
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Re: Re: Re: Time..... If we could we would? (or at least they would tell us)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• wholesale max tn shox r3 shoes discount shox r4 at www.wearempire.cn
  • From: wearempire14
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: OG
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Inverse Galilean transformation equations.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: OG
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: An Electron Structure?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: An Electron Structure?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Re: Re: Time..... If we could we would? (or at least they would tell us)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Problem: Addition of three velocities in Einstein's world
  • From: tussock
• Re: Time dilation scenarios
  • From: tussock
• Re: Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time..... If we could we would? (or at least they would tell us)
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Ciit
• Re: Re: Re: Re: Time..... If we could we would? (or at least they would tell us)
  • From: Jason Needham
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Jerry
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: thermodynamics and the universe
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Re: Re: Time..... If we could we would? (or at least they would tell us)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Re: Re: Time..... If we could we would? (or at least they would tell us)
  • From: Jason Needham
• Andromeda paradox proves Einstein's relativity is nonsense
  • From: Albertito
• Re: thermodynamics and the universe
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Time..... If we could we would? (or at least they would tell us)
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Androcles
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Surprisingly, Tom Robert's paper vindicates Miller
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Surprisingly, Tom Robert's paper vindicates Miller
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Re: Time..... If we could we would? (or at least they would tell us)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: thermodynamics and the universe
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time..... If we could we would? (or at least they would tell us)
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Decomposition of Intrinsic Spin Operator into Position and Momentum and Orbital Angular Momentum Operators
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Decomposition of Intrinsic Spin Operator into Position and Momentum and Orbital Angular Momentum Operators
  • From: Igor
• Re: Decomposition of Intrinsic Spin Operator into Position and Momentum and Orbital Angular Momentum Operators
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Note on Kronecker delta (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Decomposition of Intrinsic Spin Operator into Position and Momentum and Orbital Angular Momentum Operators
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Ciit
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Decomposition of Intrinsic Spin Operator into Position and Momentum and Orbital Angular Momentum Operators
  • From: Igor
• Re: Note on Kronecker delta (kst).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Note on Kronecker delta (kst).
  • From: Igor
• Re: Note on Kronecker delta (kst).
  • From: Igor
• Re: Re: Time..... If we could we would? (or at least they would tell us)
  • From: Jason Needham
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Mike
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Mike
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Mike
• Re: Time dilation scenarios
  • From: jem
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Mike
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Mike
• Re: Time dilation scenarios
  • From: harry
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Mike
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Mike
• Re: Time..... If we could we would? (or at least they would tell us)
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: thermodynamics and the universe
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Time..... If we could we would? (or at least they would tell us)
  • From: Jason Needham
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Decomposition of Intrinsic Spin Operator into Position and Momentum and Orbital Angular Momentum Operators
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Dono
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Prime Mover
• Re: Inertia
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Note on Kronecker delta (kst).
  • From: xxein
• Re: Inertia
  • From: xxein
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: dark matter and energy
  • From: xxein
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: OG
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: Note on Kronecker delta (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Problem: Addition of three velocities in Einstein's world
  • From: Dono
• Re: Problem: Addition of three velocities in Einstein's world
  • From: Dono
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Mike
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Mike
• Re: Note on Kronecker delta (kst).
  • From: Igor
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Time dilation scenarios
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Time dilation scenarios
  • From: PD
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Ciit
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: bz
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time dilation scenarios
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: PD
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Cosmology
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Androcles
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cosmology
  • From: harry
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: harry
• Re: Inertia
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Time dilation scenarios
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why the speed of light is contentious
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Note on Kronecker delta (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativity and Reality
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Time dilation scenarios
  • From: matscienceman
• Decomposition of Intrinsic Spin Operator into Position and Momentum and Orbital Angular Momentum Operators
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: Alen
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Darwin123
• Surprisingly, Tom Robert's paper vindicates Miller
  • From: wbbrdr
• Re: Relativity and Reality
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Relativity and Reality
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inertia
  • From: xxein
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: OG
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Dono
• Re: An Electron Structure?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Relativity and Reality
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Ciit
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity and Reality
  • From: kk
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: relativity experiments new interpretation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Jerry
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Can Intrinsic Spin be Expressed in Terms of Position and Momentum Operators?
  • From: Igor
• Re: thermodynamics and the universe
  • From: dlzc
• Re: relativity experiments new interpretation
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Mike
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Dono
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Dono
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: relativity experiments new interpretation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Can Intrinsic Spin be Expressed in Terms of Position and Momentum Operators?
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: relativity experiments new interpretation
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity experiments new interpretation
  • From: Dono
• Re: thermodynamics and the universe
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: PD
• Re: Can Intrinsic Spin be Expressed in Terms of Position and Momentum Operators?
  • From: Alen
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Raghar
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: thermodynamics and the universe
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: thermodynamics and the universe
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Raghar
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Albertito
• relativity experiments new interpretation
  • From: cosofrets
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: thermodynamics and the universe
  • From: Aage Andersen
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• thermodynamics and the universe
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Relativity and Reality
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: dark matter and energy
  • From: xxein
• Re: The farce of relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Relativity and Reality
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity and Reality
  • From: Dono
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: xxein
• Re: Entropy. / My opinion /.
  • From: socratus
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Relativity and Reality
  • From: wbbrdr
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Traveler
• Can Intrinsic Spin be Expressed in Terms of Position and Momentum Operators?
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Cosmology
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Prime Mover
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dono
• Cosmology
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativity and Reality
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Ciit
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Prime Mover
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The Expansion of Space
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: PD
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Relativity and Reality
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Prime Mover
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Prime Mover
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: Relativity and Reality
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Expansion of Space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: harry
• Relativity and Reality
  • From: Joe Avery
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The Expansion of Space
  • From: Alen
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: Amuthan
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Principle of equivalence
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Principle of equivalence
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inertia
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: xxein
• Re: Inertia
  • From: xxein
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Androcles
• manual solution solution manual study guide
  • From: sms123
• all solution manuals you want are here
  • From: manual solution for all
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: xxein
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: R Shiein
• Re: Newton gravity: the first harmonic of gravitation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: PD
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Paul Mays
• Newton gravity: the first harmonic of gravitation
  • From: Albertito
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: An Electron Structure?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: An Electron Structure?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Albertito
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: PD
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Problem: Addition of three velocities in Einstein's world
  • From: harry
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: PD
• Re: Problem: Addition of three velocities in Einstein's world
  • From: Dono
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Ciit
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: tussock
• Re: Problem: Addition of three velocities in Einstein's world
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: harry
• Problem: Addition of three velocities in Einstein's world
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: PD
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: PD
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: harry
• Re: time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: anandsr21
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Postulate on GUTS & TOE
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Inertia
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Postulate on GUTS & TOE
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Postulate on GUTS & TOE
  • From: greysky
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: PD
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: xxein
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: Inertia
  • From: xxein
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: xxein
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: Postulate on GUTS & TOE
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Postulate on GUTS & TOE
  • From: Androcles
• Re: superconductivity
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Dono
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: PD
• Re: An Electron Structure?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Albertito
• Re: An Electron Structure?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Postulate on GUTS & TOE
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Bob Remeaux
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Dono
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Postulate on GUTS & TOE
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Albertito
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Ciit
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Puzzle: speed of the fastest tennis ball
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Postulate on GUTS & TOE
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Dono
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: superconductivity
  • From: bz
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: PD
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: PD
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: harry
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: harry
• Re: time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: a question about Einstein's E=mc^2
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Passing of John Archibald Wheeler
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Passing of John Archibald Wheeler
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• The Central Role in Physics, of the Dirac Anticommutator g^uv=(1/2){gamma^u,gamma^v}
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Inertia
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Big Bang Space Expansion
  • From: tussock
• Why the speed of light is constant
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Dono
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Jerry
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: An Electron Structure?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: a question about Einstein's E=mc^2
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: a question about Einstein's E=mc^2
  • From: Dono
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS 7
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: a question about Einstein's E=mc^2
  • From: Eric Haddix
• Re: a question about Einstein's E=mc^2
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: xxein
• Re: Inertia
  • From: xxein
• Re: a question about Einstein's E=mc^2
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: a question about Einstein's E=mc^2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: a question about Einstein's E=mc^2
  • From: OG
• Re: a question about Einstein's E=mc^2
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: a question about Einstein's E=mc^2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a question about Einstein's E=mc^2
  • From: OG
• Re: a question about Einstein's E=mc^2
  • From: YBM
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• a question about Einstein's E=mc^2
  • From: Eric Haddix
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Bob Remeaux
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Nev
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• superconductivity
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Albertito
• Re: An Electron Structure?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Inertia
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Thesis Defense of the Kaluza-Klein, Intrinsic Spin Hypothesis -- EARLY DRAFT
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Inertia
  • From: xxein
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: xxein
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: An Electron Structure?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• An Electron Structure?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: PD
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: manual solution solution manual study guide
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: PD
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: PD
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Nev
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Jerry
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Jim Newman
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Jim Newman
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Jim Newman
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Inertia
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Dono
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Dono
• Re: Inertia
  • From: Thomas Heger
• manual solution solution manual study guide
  • From: manual solution for all
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• PRIVATE PHYSICS 7
  • From: karamihas
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Jerry
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time dilation
  • From: tussock
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: PD
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: PD
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: xxein
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inertia
  • From: xxein
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Bob Remeaux
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Rectus Femoris
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Rectus Femoris
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: PD
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Rectus Femoris
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• relativity is still not clear and obvious, why?
  • From: Rectus Femoris
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity is compatible with the bible and moon landing, no farts
  • From: Rectus Femoris
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: PD
• relativity is compatible with the bible and moon landing, no farts
  • From: Rectus Femoris
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: PD
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Albertito
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Alien message proves Einstein's relativity is wrong
  • From: Albertito
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: time dilation
  • From: harry
• "Gravity"
  • From: Nev
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: time dilation
  • From: kenseto
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: tussock
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: harry
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: PD
• Re: time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: PD
• INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON OPTICAL SUPERCOMPUTING (OSC'08)
  • From: optical supercomputing
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: dark matter and energy
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: harry
• Re: Inertia
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: time dilation
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: time dilation
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: why relativity almost make sense?
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: why relativity almost make sense?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: where are the missing pages from the bible?
  • From: xxein
• Re: where are the missing pages from the bible?
  • From: xxein
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: xxein
• Re: why relativity almost make sense?
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• get manual solution study guide
  • From: manual solution for all
• Re: time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: dark matter and energy
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Inertia
  • From: xxein
• time dilation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: xxein
• Re: The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: xxein
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: dark matter and energy
  • From: xxein
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: oliveroyanadel
• where are the missing pages from the bible?
  • From: Vastus Lateralis
• The differences between LET, SRT and IRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Nev
• Re: Query about intrinsic verus orbital angular momentum FINE TUNING THE QUESTION
  • From: Alen
• Re: Inertia
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple rules
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Inertia
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple rules
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: dark matter and energy
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Around The Corner
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: mitchgrav
• Around The Corner
  • From: Nomen Nescio
• Re: dark matter and energy
  • From: xxein
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: YBM
• Re: why relativity almost make sense?
  • From: xxein
• Re: can anyone answer this question about dimensions??
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: dark matter and energy
  • From: xxein
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: why relativity almost make sense?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: why relativity almost make sense?
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: why relativity almost make sense?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: D'uh! ... thwack, thwack, thwack.... "global warming mechanism"
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: why relativity almost make sense?
  • From: PD
• why inflating balloon model analog to universe
  • From: Vastus Lateralis
• Re: ufo contradict relativity, again
  • From: Vastus Lateralis
• ufo contradict relativity, again
  • From: Vastus Lateralis
• Re: dark matter and energy
  • From: dlzc
• does relativists shapeshift like reptilians?
  • From: Vastus Lateralis
• why relativity almost make sense?
  • From: Vastus Lateralis
• Re: is earth hollow inside?
  • From: Vastus Lateralis
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: is earth hollow inside?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: D'uh! ... thwack, thwack, thwack.... "global warming mechanism"
  • From: dlzc
• D'uh! ... thwack, thwack, thwack.... "global warming mechanism"
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: luke . saul
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Nev
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: A bit on Spin, (kst).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: dark matter and energy
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: A bit on Spin, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: can anyone answer this question about dimensions??
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: Dono
• Re: dark matter and energy
  • From: mitchgrav
• dark matter and energy
  • From: xxein
• china wholesale cheap coogi christian audigier shmack AKA STASH HOUSE jeans at factory price
  • From: myshoesbiz93
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: Amuthan
• Re: A bit on Spin, (kst).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A bit on Spin, (kst).
  • From: xxein
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: Amuthan
• Re: can anyone answer this question about dimensions??
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: A bit on Spin, (kst).
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: can anyone answer this question about dimensions??
  • From: xxein
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A bit on Spin, (kst).
  • From: xxein
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: A bit on Spin, (kst).
  • From: xxein
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: Amuthan
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: Amuthan
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simple rules
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: A bit on Spin, (kst).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• A bit on Spin, (kst).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Possibiliies with relativity, dealing with time dilation on a daily basis
  • From: darke
• Re: time intervals
  • From: PD
• Re: can anyone answer this question about dimensions??
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: can anyone answer this question about dimensions??
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: can anyone answer this question about dimensions??
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: can anyone answer this question about dimensions??
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: simple rules
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: math, physics and the physic
  • From: xxein
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: math, physics and the physic
  • From: Igor
• Re: Query about intrinsic verus orbital angular momentum FINE TUNING THE QUESTION
  • From: bz
• Re: time intervals
  • From: PD
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: simple rules
  • From: PD
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: simple rules
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: harry
• Re: time intervals
  • From: PD
• Re: can anyone answer this question about dimensions??
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: can anyone answer this question about dimensions??
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: kenseto
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Nev
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• yyyyyyyy
  • From: steveo
• Re: simple rules
  • From: Ralf Callenberg
• can anyone answer this question about dimensions??
  • From: steveo
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: Dono
• Re: Possibiliies with relativity, dealing with time dilation on a daily basis
  • From: PD
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: simple rules
  • From: PD
• Re: simple rules
  • From: PD
• Re: Mathematical time travel and quantum computers
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Mathematical time travel and quantum computers
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Mathematical time travel and quantum computers
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: time intervals
  • From: PD
• Re: Mathematical time travel and quantum computers
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Mathematical time travel and quantum computers
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: harry
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: harry
• Mathematical time travel and quantum computers
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: harry
• Mathematical time travel and quantum computers
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: harry
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Space has to expand or contract to have time.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: simple rules
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple rules
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: why science is all about stealing tensors?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Query about intrinsic verus orbital angular momentum FINE TUNING THE QUESTION
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Query about intrinsic verus orbital angular momentum FINE TUNING THE QUESTION
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• New theory time travel and building quantum computers
  • From: reactor1967
• manual solution solution manual study guide
  • From: sms123
• Re: How to build a quantum computer and time machine.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Query about intrinsic verus orbital angular momentum
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Query about intrinsic verus orbital angular momentum
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: why science is all about stealing tensors?
  • From: peter . m . brown
• Re: math, physics and the physic
  • From: bz
• Re: math, physics and the physic
  • From: bz
• Re: is earth hollow inside?
  • From: shalayka
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simple rules
  • From: Alen
• Re: is earth hollow inside?
  • From: shalayka
• How to build a quantum computer and time machine.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: math, physics and the physic
  • From: xxein
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: math, physics and the physic
  • From: Eric Gisse
• math, physics and the physic
  • From: xxein
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: Amuthan
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: PD
• Re: simple rules
  • From: PD
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: Amuthan
• light years space travel is possible, with one condition
  • From: duffy
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Query about intrinsic verus orbital angular momentum
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: is earth hollow inside?
  • From: duffy
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Darwin123
• is earth hollow inside?
  • From: duffy
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: OG
• Re: simple rules
  • From: duffy
• Re: simple rules
  • From: PD
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: Androcles
• Re: simple rules
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: simple rules
  • From: Ralf Callenberg
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: simple rules
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: simple rules
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Possibiliies with relativity, dealing with time dilation on a daily basis
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: simple rules
  • From: PD
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: simple rules
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Query about intrinsic verus orbital angular momentum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: OG
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: simple rules
  • From: PD
• Query about intrinsic verus orbital angular momentum
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: simple rules
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Possibiliies with relativity, dealing with time dilation on a daily basis
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Possibiliies with relativity, dealing with time dilation on a daily basis
  • From: Jimmy
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Nev
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: harry
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: simple rules
  • From: PD
• Re: simple rules
  • From: PD
• Re: simple rules
  • From: Alen
• Re: simple rules
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple rules
  • From: PD
• Re: simple rules
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: PD
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: PD
• Re: simple rules
  • From: PD
• Re: A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: harry
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: kenseto
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• simple rules
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Jerry
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: Quantized and continuum field.
  • From: xxein
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• A simple time dilation experiment
  • From: Amuthan
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Dono
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Steve Dorman
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Edward Green
• nonphysical tensors spoils the brothel
  • From: overlord
• they are forcing me to work with tensors which are not physical
  • From: overlord
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Kon
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: www.ejdoscher.com - evidence universe expands and contracts
  • From: lithium
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Jerry
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Big dumb question of the hour
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: www.ejdoscher.com - evidence universe expands and contracts
  • From: darke
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: 062 bloqueador veicular sem mensalidades - http://bloqueadorgsm.vilabol.uol.com.br 0627175832573172414088354
  • From: overlord
• Re: www.ejdoscher.com - evidence universe expands and contracts
  • From: overlord
• www.ejdoscher.com - evidence universe expands and contracts
  • From: www.ejdoscher.com
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: overlord
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Kon
• is an electron really an electron, or rather a small part of nucleus?
  • From: overlord
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Dono
• Re: 062 bloqueador veicular sem mensalidades - http://bloqueadorgsm.vilabol.uol.com.br 0627175832573172414088354
  • From: overlord
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: overlord
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: the foundation of relativity, where are the tools?
  • From: overlord
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Is there an equivalence principle for space and time?
  • From: overlord
• Re: Is there an equivalence principle for space and time?
  • From: overlord
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: overlord
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: overlord
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• nomination update, adman - occult energy loyal supporter
  • From: overlord
• nomination update, PD - occult energy
  • From: overlord
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Entropy. / My opinion /.
  • From: socratus
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• manual solution solution manual study guide
  • From: sms123
• Re: Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Quantized and continuum field.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Quantized and continuum field.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Quantized and continuum field.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Inertial frames= constant velocity ? Definition?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Quantized and continuum field.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is there an equivalence principle for space and time?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantized and continuum field.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Is there an equivalence principle for space and time?
  • From: PD
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: JanPB
• Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS 6
  • From: Igor
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: OG
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: JanPB
• Re: the foundation of relativity, where are the tools?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Quantized and continuum field.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: overlord
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: time intervals
  • From: grecian
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: grecian
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Prime Mover
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: why light through bended space from magnets still is bended?
  • From: grecian
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: why light through bended space from magnets still is bended?
  • From: bz
• Re: why light through bended space from magnets still is bended?
  • From: grecian
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: bz
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: why light through bended space from magnets still is bended?
  • From: shalayka
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is there an equivalence principle for space and time?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• why light through bended space from magnets still is bended?
  • From: grecian
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Prime Mover
• where is the magnetic energy stored?
  • From: xenu
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Randy Poe
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Kon
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Is there an equivalence principle for space and time?
  • From: jason_armitage12345
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: Dono
• Quick & Secured Pharmacy Online. w3tr6
  • From: brenlishaw
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: why science is all about stealing tensors?
  • From: xenu
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: why science is all about stealing tensors?
  • From: xenu
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: bz
• Re: why science is all about stealing tensors?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• the foundation of relativity, where are the tools?
  • From: xenu
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Prime Mover
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Vacuum and Gravity.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• entropy of black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Please come and join us
  • From: The Cool Man
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• technology transfer
  • From: lightlogics
• PRIVATE PHYSICS 6
  • From: karamihas
• Re: beta decay (geometric)
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: SR cannot determine Contraction
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: William Hayes
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• I have two beliefs I think are provable
  • From: oliveroyanadel
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: xxein
• http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
  • From: Steve Dorman
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: why science is all about stealing tensors?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Prime Mover
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GENTLEMEN ARE YOU TIRED ABOUT PAYING HUGE AMOUNT FOR GASES AND FUEL IN ORDER TO RUN YOUR CAR.WE FOUND THE REMEDY HERE.I USE THIS REMEDIAL THING FOR LAST SIX MONTHS.STILL MY CAR IS RUN WITH THE REMEDIAL THING.I DONT CARE ABOUT FUEL RATE INCREASING.THE L
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: why science is all about stealing tensors?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Derivation of Heisenberg Uncertainty from Kaluza Klein Geometry
  • From: rom126
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: bz
• Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: Kon
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Prime Mover
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Prime Mover
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• GENTLEMEN ARE YOU TIRED ABOUT PAYING HUGE AMOUNT FOR GASES AND FUEL IN ORDER TO RUN YOUR CAR.WE FOUND THE REMEDY HERE.I USE THIS REMEDIAL THING FOR LAST SIX MONTHS.STILL MY CAR IS RUN WITH THE REMEDIAL THING.I DONT CARE ABOUT FUEL RATE INCREASING.THE LINK IS BELOW
  • From: vicky
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• star formation and dark energy
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I arrived to this group convinced relativity was wrong, now I leave convinced it is worse than wrong
  • From: xxein
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation requires physical contraction
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: Special relativity in Jacob Bronowski's "Ascent of Man"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativists think that clocks are measuring time?
  • From: xxein
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: I arrived to this group convinced relativity was wrong, now I leave convinced it is worse than wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: I arrived to this group convinced relativity was wrong, now I leave convinced it is worse than wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what happens if relativity remains not-understandable?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: I arrived to this group convinced relativity was wrong, now I leave convinced it is worse than wrong
  • From: PD
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Eric Gisse
• what happens if relativity remains not-understandable?
  • From: xenu
• Re: I arrived to this group convinced relativity was wrong, now I leave convinced it is worse than wrong
  • From: wugi
• Re: I arrived to this group convinced relativity was wrong, now I leave convinced it is worse than wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: is embedded relativity possible?
  • From: xenu
• why relativists are forcing me to be in, otherwise i will be out?
  • From: duke nukem
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: is embedded relativity possible?
  • From: duke nukem
• Re: are relativity shields possible?
  • From: duke nukem
• Re: is embedded relativity possible?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: are relativity shields possible?
  • From: PD
• Re: is embedded relativity possible?
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: I arrived to this group convinced relativity was wrong, now I leave convinced it is worse than wrong
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: are relativity shields possible?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: is embedded relativity possible?
  • From: duke nukem
• Re: are relativity shields possible?
  • From: duke nukem
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: is embedded relativity possible?
  • From: PD
• Re: are relativity shields possible?
  • From: PD
• Re: I arrived to this group convinced relativity was wrong, now I leave convinced it is worse than wrong
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• are relativity shields possible?
  • From: duke nukem
• Re: I arrived to this group convinced relativity was wrong, now I leave convinced it is worse than wrong
  • From: PD
• is embedded relativity possible?
  • From: duke nukem
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Pmb
• Re: why science is all about stealing tensors?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Dono
• Re: Real today approach for building a working time machine
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: I arrived to this group convinced relativity was wrong, now I leave convinced it is worse than wrong
  • From: Dono
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Igor
• Re: why science is all about stealing tensors?
  • From: Igor
• I arrived to this group convinced relativity was wrong, now I leave convinced it is worse than wrong
  • From: Albertito
• Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Albertito
• Re: why science is all about stealing tensors?
  • From: stone
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Dono
• Re: another contradiction, this is huge
  • From: stone
• Re: another contradiction, this is huge
  • From: stone
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Albertito
• Re: relativists think that clocks are measuring time?
  • From: stone
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Dono
• Re: relativists think that clocks are measuring time?
  • From: stone
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Albertito
• Re: relativists think that clocks are measuring time?
  • From: stone
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: relativists think that clocks are measuring time?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: goog
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Juan R.
• Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: Kon
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativistic problem
  • From: Eoghan
• Real today approach for building a working time machine
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
  • From: Juan R.
• Real today approach for building a working time machine
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: another contradiction, this is huge
  • From: Ragnar
• Re: relativists think that clocks are measuring time?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Androcles
• Real today approach for building a working time machine.
  • From: reactor1967
• Vacuum and Light quanta.
  • From: socratus
• Re: What is Proper Time?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Real today approach for building a working time machine.
  • From: reactor1967
• Real today approach for building a working time machine.
  • From: reactor1967
• Real today approach for building a working time machine.
  • From: reactor1967
• Real today approace for building a time machine
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The Shapiro delay is bullshit
  • From: Albertito
• Re: a programm
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Pmb
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: why science is all about stealing tensors?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Pmb
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Pmb
• Re: another contradiction, this is huge
  • From: xxein
• Re: Question on dark matter?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Had enough of the newsgroup scum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: why science is all about stealing tensors?
  • From: xxein
• Re: relativists think that clocks are measuring time?
  • From: xxein
• Re: a programm
  • From: xxein
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• relativists think that clocks are measuring time?
  • From: stone
• Re: time intervals
  • From: stone
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time intervals
  • From: stone
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: time intervals
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: YBM
• Re: time intervals
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• why science is all about stealing tensors?
  • From: stone
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: PD
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: time intervals
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A bit on NonSymmetrical Metrics.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn
• Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
  • From: Bronwyn