Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
- From: "Juan R." González-Álvarez <juanREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:03:54 +0200 (CEST)
"Juan R." González-Álvarez wrote on Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:00:26 +0200:
interpretation is a mere analogy which is "not very useful" and warn
readers that experimental results by astronomers are matter, and those
results may be derived without using geometric formulation.
I mean that experimental results by astronomers are matter in a
experimental based science as physics, and those experimental results may
be derived without using geometric formulation as proven in many places.
The geometric view of gravity as spacetime curvature is not just one of
many myths promoted by relativists but one without experimental basis.
--
http://canonicalscience.org/en/miscellaneouszone/guidelines.txt
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
- Next by Date: Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
- Previous by thread: Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
- Next by thread: Re: The Traditional Superficial Explanation of Relativity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|