Re: a programm
- From: xxein <xxein@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 1, 8:59 pm, "Thomas Heger" <hba...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"xxein" <xx...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitragnews:cf713302-5c1d-4391-8cfe-e791214b531c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 1, 2:52 am, "Thomas Heger" <hba...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"xxein" <xx...@xxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im
Newsbeitragnews:5fd37a89-a94f-44e9-b4fe-8976fdafaeae@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mar 29, 8:25 pm, "Thomas Heger" <hba...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
xxein:
----------------------------
You might as well invent another version of the "Rubic cube".
It has no bearing on physics(?) nor the "physic".
Th
---------------------------
Hi
I didn't know, but what i developed is called a heuristic. The physicists
dont like that, because in some misguided manner they treat physics as a
sport. and heuristics are like cheating.
Anyhow, I guess my -well- heuristic is well behaved and functions like
supposed. And that is something..
Thomas Heger
xxein:
--------------------------
Actually, we like that. But it has to apply (show meaning) to
a physics - not just an abstract mathematic. You are trying to say
that a mathematic "must" have a meaningful physics attached to it.
That would be like imagining that your love for a girl will transform
her life even while she had no knowledge of you.
Math is fine and physics is fine, but they are not the same thing.
That 'guy over there' is not necessarily part of your family. Maybe
"Lucy" can say that there is a dna connection, but she can't make a
sun or moon.
The physic is the Sun and the math is Lucy. Can Lucy understand that
the Sun is not her progeny?
But she can think that her thoughts and actions will somehow influence
the Sun. This is a common way of making a physics. Projection (a
little stretched, perhaps).
We make a God in our own image, for ?'s sake and we had better learn
that we have no physical basis to do so. But we do so anyway --- and
believe it.
Do you still want to project a math into the physic without knowing
the difference?
TH
-------------------------------
Its blasting my mind, because its too difficult. Once I think I made some
advance than I think its too far away.
I now wonder how to do 4d-geometry and what is 'complex-geometry' or how
does that look like.
Heuristic is as far as I can see a good start, but only a start. The scheme
is quite powerful, but its not the real thing.
I quote Feynman : its fun to find things out. No idea where that is leading
me
(Usually I dont like quotes)- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
xxein: Welcome to reality.
You can believe what you want at your own risk. Just don't drag me
into it by any authoritarian measure.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: a programm
- From: Thomas Heger
- Re: a programm
- References:
- Re: a programm
- From: xxein
- Re: a programm
- From: Thomas Heger
- Re: a programm
- From: xxein
- Re: a programm
- From: Thomas Heger
- Re: a programm
- Prev by Date: Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
- Next by Date: Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
- Previous by thread: Re: a programm
- Next by thread: Re: a programm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|