Re: a programm


..

xxein:
------------------------
Yes. That is what we have attempted to do since the dawn of
whatever. But you, too, are using a 'classical' approach. What are
the definitions? How do you make definitions? How do you define
without using some classical sense?

TH
--------------------------
I use time as a starting point ant this is a process of counting, that does not need a unit.
energy is dimensionless too. It is intensity of rotation summed over an area (of spacetime). I use the timedefiniton of that observer to cut this into pieces and transform it into the realm of observations.

xxein:
------------------------
Waves and particles are the same thing. How do we choose to
differentiate them into separate sets of physics and math? What does
your automata represent? Iow, when we distinguish a wave or particle
as 'the' function, we make it 'classically' a wave or particle profile
without any consideration that they represent the same thing.

TH
--------------------------
that was the picture of the screw. It has two aspects, one is quantized (if you scratch over the bolt) one is not (if you screw it in). The idea was about rotation in something fourdimensional imaginary, described by quaternions. Those quaternions have that properties of beeing sc(r)ew-symmetric.
In fact, there was a lie. The automat is not what I wanted to model. I said that somehow our world is working like that

xxein:
------------------------
Now add to that the fact that gravity exists. Why and how does it
exist? I'm sure I've said this before. Explain it before you use it
as a 'classical' device in your supposedly 'non-classical' automata.

Gravity's features are well documented. But this does not mean that
we understand the physic of it. When we say we understand 'the
physics' of it, it only means that it has a predictive behavior. Our
'physics' doesn't explain it, it only gives it a descriptive
behavior. We can get similar results from any 'bully pulpit' telling
us how to think.

TH
--------------------------
I wanted to develop a model for spacetime of GR. That was my task. Somehow I thought, whatever I find will be in accordance to GR too, because it is based entirly on that ideas. I didn't worry much about gravity, because in microlevels its not expected and on big scale I have GR to deal with it.
The hole thing is more or less geometric. I'm quite happy to have gravity encoded into geometry of worldlines. The exact reason is not easy to find, because of gravity is so enormously weak. In first approximation you may simply forget about that.

Thomas Heger

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: a programm
    ... I think about gravity as curved spacetime. ... It is based on very few assumptions (energy thats beeing conserved. ... I've been all over math and physics. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: a programm
    ... Now add to that the fact that gravity exists. ... physics' of it, it only means that it has a predictive behavior. ... I've been all over math and physics. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
    ... experiment together into a logical concept of the physic. ... Special relativity, welcome to modern physics. ... xxein: Sorry to be late, but I think you have to include GR also. ... Our MMX does not take place without a gravity. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Lorentz Ether Theory and FTL Paradoxes
    ... That's what stellar models do, ... >xxein: Look, Bilge, I can supply a mathematic that completely ... work through halliday & resnick and a few years of basic physics ... That is rather hollow posturing. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Magnetic field and relative motion
    ... > xxein wrote: ... The physicality didn't seem to work. ... universe based on ALL observation from cosmological to quantum (with ... SR/SRT-types and had neglected gravity. ...
    (sci.physics)