Re: a programm
- From: "Thomas Heger" <hballo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 12:35:43 +0200
"xxein" <xxein@xxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:0aa42cc0-4cb5-4985-8adf-dc3a7ebdc9f6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 5, 7:06 am, "Thomas Heger" <hba...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some addition:
The main difficulty about my idea is, that you cannot imagin a rotation in a
continuum. That is not possible in our world. Space is symmetric und
commutativ. We are used to this view, cause this is how it goes in our
world. But spacetime is imaginary and anticommutativ. It has the disturbing
feature of rotations to rotate backwards on the 'other side' of the time
axis. The hypermeridians build a kind of eight. In the projection into our
space of observations that kind of rotation would look like tiny wiggles
without a reason (or like the Casimir force).
Its very interesting, that only the time axis has this feature of
rotationasymetry. That could be a reason, why the elements develop only into
that direction. But its not restricted to this. It could split into
backwards and forewards rotation and pace off in space.
I hope you understand the idea. Maybe I should be a bit more metaphoric:
some energy is 'contained' by something evel. It goes 'out' sometimes, but
gets pushed back all the time, because the surrounding has no possibility to
keep that energy. So it goes out and in and out and in...In this process the
sorrounding gets kicks, that it wants to get rid of. It kicks in outwards
direction if possible, but that is only the case if there is something with
timelike symmetry. If there is something the kicks could follow a path to
that object and kick that.
Thomas Heger
Thomas Heger
xxein:
----------------------------
Rotation requires energy. Where does it come from and how is
it put into that form?
TH
-------------------------
shure. Thats the only axiom: energy is conserved. Oh, not really, there are a few more. I can boil that down to a few simple rules. I just wrote a post called 'simple rules'.
In fact I don't even need the term energy. I replace that by something more abstract called intensity. Its a dimensionless number. If you count the evoloution of that, you can split intensity of rotation over a sum of that eventspace into time, lenght and energy.
Thomas Heger
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: a programm
- From: xxein
- Re: a programm
- References:
- Re: a programm
- From: xxein
- Re: a programm
- From: Thomas Heger
- Re: a programm
- From: xxein
- Re: a programm
- From: Thomas Heger
- Re: a programm
- From: xxein
- Re: a programm
- From: Thomas Heger
- Re: a programm
- From: xxein
- Re: a programm
- From: Thomas Heger
- Re: a programm
- From: xxein
- Re: a programm
- From: Thomas Heger
- Re: a programm
- From: xxein
- Re: a programm
- Prev by Date: Re: Length Of A Curve in Spacetime
- Next by Date: Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- Previous by thread: Re: a programm
- Next by thread: Re: a programm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|