Re: Inertia
- From: xxein <xxein@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 10, 8:02 am, "Thomas Heger" <hba...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some more ideas:
if you cut off the radiation term and look only, how that akt on masses, you
get a set of addable - well- states.
Imagine a few objects. They send out their influence. Those could be added
or subtracted. They could be treated as entities of their own rights. Those
build things like waves under some aspect. Since the hole picture is
four-dimensional and complex, you have to imagin how that would look to an
observer.
Simple case is that kind of screws. They look like waves with an imaginary
component. Thats like light. It whirls around an imaginary axis and pace
through space.
An electron as an entity that is separated and charged. That is timestable
hence those influences allways return. They do, because its separated. The
influences display themselfs as rotating around the timeaxis. Light is
supposed to rotate around a spacelike axis. If that light now hits an
electron, the influence tend to twist that. Those angular momentum add to
some new orientation. But not all of that light. Some is not near enough and
some the electron does not want. the electron has to stay a continous
entity. That requires some stable patterns, what is not needed to build that
stable pattern, is not within the electron but goes somewhere else. That is
still light, but has now a different angle since something is missing, thats
the part the electron got. The angle in that picture is a velocity to an
observer. To him the hole thing will look like the light has bounced off the
electron.
If you take that mechanism a bit more abstract, you can assign functionals
to those influences, called momentum. You can do that to the objects and to
spacelike influences. Both have the ability to interact. In terms of
observations you have an other property, that is position. That is the
position relativ to an observer. What the momentum does is changing the
position of an object. In that imaginary space velocity is like twist in
respect to the time axis. A distance is the norm of those intervalls
(between observer and object).
It is possible to take those functionals as objects and add or subtract
them. They build a group of linear relations.
Thomas Heger
xxein: It is also possible to imagine a girl you liked when you were
both 14 yrs-old. You just go back in time some 60 or so years later
and find her just as she was then. Just a relational property.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Inertia
- From: Thomas Heger
- Re: Inertia
- References:
- Inertia
- From: Thomas Heger
- Re: Inertia
- From: Thomas Heger
- Inertia
- Prev by Date: time dilation
- Next by Date: Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
- Previous by thread: Re: Inertia
- Next by thread: Re: Inertia
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
