Re: time dilation



On Apr 10, 5:19�pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 10, 3:40�pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]

� � � I am sure that some of our scientific friends who believe in a
distance contraction will be anxious to explain this phenomenon.
Robert B. Winn

Sure, but what'd be the point?

What could we possibly tell you that could undo 20 years of
misunderstanding relativity?

Well, evidently you cannot tell me anything, Eric. Surely, scientists
must have some explanation for this. I am not the object here. You
need to exlain this so that young people who are just learning will
know whether there is a distance contraction. Don't you care about
the young people?
Robert B. Winn
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: transformation equations
    ... problem and does so without a distance contraction. ... Robert B. Winn ... Very scientific, Dirk. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: transformation equations
    ... problem and does so without a distance contraction. ... Robert B. Winn ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: simultaneity
    ... This message is brought to you by Androcles ... |> simultaneity and distance contraction. ... |> Robert B. Winn ... Robert B. Winn ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: simultaneity
    ... simultaneity and distance contraction. ... Robert B. Winn ... Martin Hogbin- Hide quoted text - ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: time dilation
    ... distance contraction will be anxious to explain this phenomenon. ... Robert B. Winn ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)

Loading