Re: time dilation
- From: rbwinn <rbwinn3@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 10, 5:46 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 10, 4:28 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:If that is the case, Eric, I would go back to some of the people who
On Apr 10, 5:19�pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 10, 3:40�pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
� � � I am sure that some of our scientific friends who believe in a
distance contraction will be anxious to explain this phenomenon.
Robert B. Winn
Sure, but what'd be the point?
What could we possibly tell you that could undo 20 years of
misunderstanding relativity?
Well, evidently you cannot tell me anything, Eric. Surely, scientists
must have some explanation for this. I am not the object here. You
need to exlain this so that young people who are just learning will
know whether there is a distance contraction. Don't you care about
the young people?
Robert B. Winn
The only thing that is evident is that I cannot tell you something
that will make you understand relativity that hasn't been told to you
in the past 20 years of you not understanding relativity and the past
10 years of not understanding relativity on USENET.- Hide quoted text -
run those schools where you were learning to be a scientist and ask
for my money to be returned. These relativity scientists are coming
up with new information all of the time.
Robert B. Winn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: time dilation
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: time dilation
- References:
- time dilation
- From: rbwinn
- Re: time dilation
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: time dilation
- From: rbwinn
- Re: time dilation
- From: Eric Gisse
- time dilation
- Prev by Date: Re: time dilation
- Next by Date: Re: where are the missing pages from the bible?
- Previous by thread: Re: time dilation
- Next by thread: Re: time dilation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
