An Electron Structure?
- From: "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 1, 3:17 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
About Electron Spin and Structure.
Let a pair of Objects O1 and O2 have a comparative
speed of V12, measured relatively to an external
observer K, and a 2nd pair of Objects O3 and O4
have a comparative velocity of V34, again relative
to K.
Relative to another observer K', V12'=/=V12 and
V34' =/=V34, however the ratio,
V12/V34 = V12'/V34', Eq.(Ratio)
is invariant. One might look at the ratio's of orbits
to see that thoses ratios are invariant, but the
periods of the orbits themselves are relative.
The ratio of the periods is invariant.
Allow me to set-up an electron structure such as
in this figure using charges, (charges "a" and "b"
are negative),
+
a b Fig1.
too provide an apparent (-) charge.
The charges produce an energy, a*b/r = + energy,
to account for the +electron mass.
I crunched some numbers for above Fig1, that look
good.
I found the distance between "a" and "b" to be
2*10^-20 cm, and the distances between the "+"
to "a" and "b" to 4*10^-20, using the isosceles
triangle, in Fig1.
So distance { a->(+) or b->(+) } = 2 * a=>b.
That provides a mass of .911*10^-28 grams=
electron mass.
The dimensions of the structure are small but
finite, well below the maximum allowed by
experimental techniques.
I'd appreciate a confirmation or correction of
the energy stored in that configuration.
I use CGS and esu (for charge).
Furthermore, below, is a basis for "intrinsic"
spin, that can be imposed upon the Fig1
configuration.
You may want to cut out a little triangle of paper,
to do the spins.
a
+
b
then
a b
+
then
a
+
b
and then return to,
+
a b
At the point we started.
We rotated couple (a,b) 720 degs while rotating
(+) about couple (a,b) 360 degs.
That works out well because of the ratio of lengths,
{ (a)=>(b) } = 1/2 { (a or b) => (+) }, as does the
charge of the system summing to (-1).
I cannot find a CS to transform away the spin
ratio 360/720 = 1/2.
The above describes an electron spin structure.
Charges "a" and "b" have twice the relative spin
as the (+) has in the ratio of (a) to (b) as (+) has
to the couple (a) and (b).
That ratio is 1/2 = intrinstic spin,
and as I pointed out above in Eq.(Ratio) that's
invariant .
Three body problems, like the one above is,
quite complicated, unless there is a specific
objection, I/we could try a numerical analysis
approach to get the actual dimensions and
spin rates.
Conclusion:
The mass, spin and charge of an electron can
be defined that way, maybe.
Looks good, (fingers crossed).
Regards
Ken S. Tucker
PS: If those number look good to you fella's I
can post my spins.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: An Electron Structure?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: An Electron Structure?
- Prev by Date: Re: I have a question about relativity so that I do not become another crackpot.
- Next by Date: Re: My New Energy Formula
- Previous by thread: My New Energy Formula
- Next by thread: Re: An Electron Structure?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|