superconductivity
- From: "Thomas Heger" <hballo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:25:25 +0200
Hi Ng
There is one more strange result from my model. It's a kind of mechanism for superconductivity.
It requires giving up the idea of electrons. Not really in total, but to concentrate on something else. You should think about flow of energy and the meaning of the term heat.
If you have atoms in a lattice and wonder how those do exchange influences, you naturally think about pushes and charges. Pushes in a way, that one atom is 'hitting' the other. Charged particles mediate a force by their enormous strength. But that picture is quite to classic. Atoms are not little balls and electrons neither.
You have to think about flow of energy in a very abstract way. That is not that obvious, since we are used to some kind of observations in our surrounding. That observation is our view on the world, but it's not the view of the atom.
You should abandon the requirement of reality to be described by real numbers. It's not the case since Maxwell, since real fields are described by imaginary numbers.
If you don't think about atom as tiny balls, what else are they? For some reason you may forget the atoms too. It's simply misleading to concentrate on that. It's important to think about heat.
If you treat any kind of object in a relativistic manner, you may say its in free fall. Its path through space-time is called worldline. Those worldlines are not always aligned, since objects may move. A measure of that 'no-in-line' behaviour is as kind of sum the term heat. Little objects may have different directions through spacetime, but in a lattice only on average.
So how do atom influence each other? Again, forget the atoms. Think about atoms as excited spacetime building stable patterns. A bit like whirls in a fluid. So the question is not, how those whirls are pushing each other, but how does that fluid flow. The influence of objects from one to the other I call for some reason influences. The objects I call objects. Those are modelled out of elements. Those are events or point like intervals. Those elements evolve in a mechanism arising from their antisymmetric behaviour.
Charge is a special kind of rotation in that picture, magnetism an other one. Mass is the sum of intensities of rotation in a certain hyperarea that is 'flowing' into its future.
Now imagine an influence passing through a lattice. It's getting from object to object and transferred through time and space. An object acts like a very tiny gyroscope. It has a timelike axis and spacelike axis. The antisymmetry does it make possible to store energy in timelike direction. In. spacelike directions it is symmetric and will be send away. There the rotation cannot be kept. Its like gears in gearbox.
If now the lattice is hot, those axis do not align and every single object keeps some rotation and radiates some away. The more is radiated, the higher the temperature.
If now the object is very could, the axis get aligned and keep aligned. And influence can now pass right through and is not radiated away.
Thomas Heger
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: superconductivity
- From: bz
- Re: superconductivity
- Prev by Date: Re: time dilation
- Next by Date: Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
- Previous by thread: Thesis Defense of the Kaluza-Klein, Intrinsic Spin Hypothesis -- EARLY DRAFT
- Next by thread: Re: superconductivity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
