Re: Principle of equivalence

On Apr 16, 12:22 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 15, 9:59 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Apr 15, 10:49 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 15, 8:46 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 15, 9:42�pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 15, 7:55�pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]

It is SO CUTE watching you try to understand that Galilean
transformations are restricted for one time....

Time is relative, Eric.
Robert B. Winn

Now make the obvious conclusion that the Galilean transformations are
wrong. C'mon, make that logical leap. You admit it every time you say
stuffl ike that.

Well, I am really sorry about what I did to scientific time, Eric.  I
know how important that was to you.  So what do you think about the
principle of equivalence?
Robert B. Winn

Arrogant and stupid, always fun.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Spoken like a scientist.
Robert B. Winn
.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast