Re: Principle of equivalence
- From: "Androcles" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:21:32 +0100
--
This message is brought to you by Androcles
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
"Bryan Olson" <fakeaddress@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:yjmNj.1889$I55.454@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Androcles wrote:
| > --
| > This message is brought to you by Androcles
| > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
| >
| > "Bryan Olson" wrote:
| > | rbwinn wrote:
| > | > The Lorentz equations disagree with this.
| > |
| > | Flat-out wrong. Big red X through the rest.
| >
| > Flat out right, the cuckoo malformations disagree with this.
| > Big red X through Olson.
|
| Ah, thanks Androcles.
|
| You had me worried yesterday, when you seemed to agree with one
| of my posts.
|
|
I did agree with one of your posts, you must have had a day off
from being wrong.
Blind faith in Einstein's crackpottery doesn't make you right, ever.
If you actually studied the derivation of the cuckoo malformations
you'd realise it, but honestly, you don't have the capability to handle
the mathematics.
.
- References:
- Principle of equivalence
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Principle of equivalence
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: Principle of equivalence
- From: Androcles
- Re: Principle of equivalence
- From: Bryan Olson
- Principle of equivalence
- Prev by Date: Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- Next by Date: Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- Previous by thread: Re: Principle of equivalence
- Next by thread: Re: Principle of equivalence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
