Re: time dilation
- From: rbwinn <rbwinn3@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 17, 9:12�pm, Bryan Olson <fakeaddr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
rbwinn wrote:
Bryan Olson wrote:
rbwinn wrote:
[...] So let's look at whatYou have the units wrong. The clock reading will be in
scientists say a clock would read in the train car.
� � �t'=(x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
seconds, not meters.
Some scientist is going through my posts and changing equations. �This
was not the only one that got changed.
I'm not clear on what you are claiming. Do think someone is
canceling your posts, then forging versions with altered
equations in their place?
�At least we can be certain we
are dealing with real scientists.
Personally, I am an amateur kookologist. If I can correct
your physics, you're several orders of magnitude short of
advancing that discipline.
--
--Bryan
This was not the only equation that got changed. Someone also changed
another one to read 3D300,000 km/sec instead of 300,000 km/sec.
Scientists do this because they find it amusing among themselves. I
did not put the wrong equation here, either.
Whenever scientists get a question put to them that they do not like,
you will see this sort of activity.
Robert B. Winn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: time dilation
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: time dilation
- References:
- time dilation
- From: rbwinn
- Re: time dilation
- From: xxein
- Re: time dilation
- From: rbwinn
- Re: time dilation
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: time dilation
- From: rbwinn
- Re: time dilation
- From: Bryan Olson
- time dilation
- Prev by Date: Re: Who here has spent time in a mental hospital? Graduated from college?
- Next by Date: Re: Principle of equivalence
- Previous by thread: Re: time dilation
- Next by thread: Re: time dilation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|