Re: time dilation
- From: rbwinn <rbwinn3@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 19, 3:19 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 19, 1:43 pm, Bryan Olson <fakeaddr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
rbwinn wrote:
Bryan Olson wrote:
rbwinn wrote:This was not the only equation that got changed. Someone also changed
Some scientist is going through my posts and changing equations. �ThisI'm not clear on what you are claiming. Do think someone is
was not the only one that got changed.
canceling your posts, then forging versions with altered
equations in their place?
another one to read 3D300,000 km/sec instead of 300,000 km/sec.
Scientists do this because they find it amusing among themselves. I
did not put the wrong equation here, either.
Whenever scientists get a question put to them that they do not like,
you will see this sort of activity.
Robert B. Winn
That's a paranoid delusion.
--
--Bryan
Gotta admit it is a hilarious delusion.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yeah, so you claim that I put 3D300,000 km per second in one of my
posts. Go sell it somewhere else. Someone is trying to play
psychiatrist.
Robert B. Winn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: time dilation
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: time dilation
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: time dilation
- References:
- time dilation
- From: rbwinn
- Re: time dilation
- From: xxein
- Re: time dilation
- From: rbwinn
- Re: time dilation
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: time dilation
- From: rbwinn
- Re: time dilation
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: time dilation
- From: rbwinn
- Re: time dilation
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: time dilation
- From: Eric Gisse
- time dilation
- Prev by Date: Re: Principle of equivalence
- Next by Date: Re: time dilation
- Previous by thread: Re: time dilation
- Next by thread: Re: time dilation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|