Re: constancy of light
- From: YBM <ybmess@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 21:41:48 +0200
YBM a écrit :
rbwinn a écrit :obvious typo : ..../(t-vx/c^2) = (ct-vt)/(t-vct/c^2)On May 5, 11:18�am, YBM <ybm...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:rbwinn wrote:Einstein's own equations forWrong. They work.
velocity of light do not work in the Lorentz equations if x or x' are
negative.
No, they do not work. Einstein said that x=ct, x'=ct'. If x is
negative, then
t'=(t-vx/c^2)/sqrt (1-v^2/c^2)
cannot be used with the equation x=ct. The velocity of light has to
be -c in the equation for t' in order for the equation to work if x is
negative. x=(-c)t, not x=ct.
Wrong.
Let's assume that x=ct
By LT we get :
x'= gamma*(x-vt)
t'= gamma*(t-vx/c^2) where gamma=1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
let's have a look at x'/t' (*) under the condition that x=ct :
x'/t' = (x-vt)/(t-vx^2/c^2) = (ct-vt)/(t-vct/c^2)
= t(c-v)/( t (1 - v/c) ) = c(c-v)/(c-v).
= c
=> x'=ct'
(*) the case t'=0 is trivially ok (0=c0).
- References:
- constancy of light
- From: rbwinn
- Re: constancy of light
- From: YBM
- Re: constancy of light
- From: rbwinn
- Re: constancy of light
- From: YBM
- constancy of light
- Prev by Date: Does photons really travel?
- Next by Date: Re: What property of space, time or matter makes the universe three dimensionally?
- Previous by thread: Re: constancy of light
- Next by thread: Re: constancy of light
- Index(es):