Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Prime Mover <epleite@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 07:09:02 -0700 (PDT)
On 5 maio, 11:35, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nowhere is science related to making claims about the world and then
expecting Nature to obey those claims. That is whatVanFlandernis
trying to do, and that simply is not science. <shrug>
TomRoberts
I disagree. Deductive reasoning is applied very often in Science,
simply
because a set of observations, in most of the cases, does not have
a unique solution, i.e., there is not a unique model that explains it.
Therefore,
to expect that inductive reasoning alone will always lead to a correct
interpretation
is a mistake. That's why a set of starting premises ("claims about the
world")
and constraints are often attached in most of data analysis.
.
- References:
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Juan R.
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Juan R.
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- Prev by Date: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
- Next by Date: Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
- Previous by thread: Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- Next by thread: Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- Index(es):