em-mechanism=gravity mechanism
- From: Thomas Heger <tomheg_nospamxxx@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 17:00:31 +0200
Hi Ng
after thinking about this for a while I have to state, that the em-force and gravity describe exactly the same 'mechanism'.
It's is different to us, since we give certain relations different names. Gravity is acting on masses, that are somehow objects. Those are stable somethings over some time. Atom in general are small and not quite heavy (about 10^-27 kg and 10^-15 m in diameter ) Light is fast (3 10^8 m/s). That are in total small numbers, since the light is influenced only within the objects). And it's not directed, since time has no orientation.
If we think about charge, we assign something different to that mechanism. That is how *space* behaves. That is how we describe movement of these somethings in spacelike direction in near interaction with something else. I call that a pattern (usually we call that a particle). That has mass too. But if we're talking about charge, we address, how that pattern is build. Those numbers are big: speed of light again and the shadow area of that particle if watched from an other (now this is big and spreading over some space, since we're talking about small distances). These are big numbers since spacetime is somehow 'stiff'. That is oriented, since spacetime is anti-symmetric. But it's the same mechanism. So we could possibly derive G by the maxwell equations.
(details in my new 'book'?. Still not much math within, but a lot of drawings and links)
http://docs.google.com/Present?docid=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6
TH
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: em-mechanism=gravity mechanism
- From: Sue...
- Re: em-mechanism=gravity mechanism
- Prev by Date: "The Einstein Hoax"
- Next by Date: Re: Does photons really travel?
- Previous by thread: "The Einstein Hoax"
- Next by thread: Re: em-mechanism=gravity mechanism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|