Re: What's wrong with these pictures???

On May 17, 7:13�am, bz <bz+...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in news:95a55775-9417-470a-b60d-
b47545c69...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

Well, actually, all I have to do is come up with an explanation of the
results of the Michelson-Morley experiment that is different from
Einstein's which does not involve a length contraction or relativity
of simultaneity. �

NO! This shows that you do NOT understand how science works.

There are ALWAYS an infinite number of explanations.

Each explanation having some additional complexity added to it.

Science says 'test the SIMPLEST explanation FIRST'.
Science is ALWAYS trying to DISPROVE the currently accepted explanation.

As long as a simpler explanation is satisfactory, it stands.

Again, I tell you that YOU must propose a theory that explains something
that the theory you are trying to disprove fails to explain.
You must demonstrate that a reproducible experiment yields data that the
simplest theory fails to explain but that your theory succeeds at
explaining.

Science is not a matter of debate, it a process of DISPROVING the currently
held theory and replacing it with a better, more inclusive theory.

Once a theory has been disprove, it is no longer accepted [except in a
limited realm of applicability].

You are trying to revive a disproven theory but failing.
You must first disprove Einstein AND demonstrate, by experiment, that your
theory is BETTER.

Well, what we have today is show business, not science. Scientists
already put together nuclear explosions, core meltdowns, and atomic
waste using Einstein's theory. I would not personally have imagined
any of those things using the mathematics that I use. So there is the
matter of purpose involved also. Scientists of today have an agenda
and purpose which they work together to achieve. When I say, "Use
velocity of light instead of speed of light, and the question of light
traveling at c in two different frames of reference is solved,"
scientists ignore it because what they are doing is more complicated,
and they have already done all of these impressive things using speed
of light and the distance contraction. What scientists are doing is
seeking attention for the purpose of getting government funding for
various experiments, as you say, which give scientists a comfortable
life without having to do much. The more you can keep people confused
who control public revenues, the easier you see life to be.
Robert B. Winn
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: What is a software engineer?
    ... provide any explanation of why the experiment "works", ... As to whether this is indicative of some correlation between its theoretical concepts and reality at some level, opinions are divided, from those who claim it gives 'strong evidence' that reality is in fact like science says it is, to those who claim it says nothing at all about the real nature of reality, Its only a means of foretelling how that will behave. ... The question is what is a software engineer? ... You should note that this is why computer *scientists* are such an infernal waste of space. ...
    (comp.lang.javascript)
  • Re: Kent Hovinds doctoral dissertation
    ... type of thing that counts as an explanation. ... scientists attempt to understand things. ... I already opffered considerably more evidence than you of your ... you show why faith is incompatible with science. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: whered Sean go?
    ... So it's not science. ... The supernatural is always a potential explanation. ... including is the need for at least human level ID. ... anthropologists, forensic scientists, and even SETI scientists are ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Behe closes the lid on evolution.
    ... Science has discovered the natural explanations, ... not an explanation. ... There is no evidence that any of the history of life or of the ... Scientists tend to assume that every explanation is false and then test ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: For Howard: Natural Selection & Causation
    ... Pre-19th century there were a lot of things that science had no answer ... In the absence of any scientific answer, scientists of that age ... explanation *because* that is effectively what they were saying. ... Darwin and Owen was Darwin's worst enemy. ...
    (talk.origins)