sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: Dredd
• Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Dredd
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Dredd
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: mluttgens
• Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False by Seju Strich
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Might Foldy-Wouthuysen Transformations contain a Hidden Fermion Mass Generation Mechanism?
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• "Gravity"
  • From: Wen
• Re: Might Foldy-Wouthuysen Transformations contain a Hidden Fermion Mass Generation Mechanism?
  • From: kp
• Re: Might Foldy-Wouthuysen Transformations contain a Hidden Fermion Mass Generation Mechanism?
  • From: kp
• Re: Clock hypothesis ( non heuristic )
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What if: Romans see potential of Steam Power?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: PD
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: Is an actual photon needed?
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is an actual photon needed?
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: PD
• Basti Newsgroup: computer science (public)
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: Androcles
• Re: (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Might Foldy-Wouthuysen Transformations contain a Hidden Fermion Mass Generation Mechanism?
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Is an actual photon needed?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is an actual photon needed?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Universal Velocity 1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is an actual photon needed?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: PD
• Re: Is an actual photon needed?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Universal Velocity 1
  • From: xxein
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Is an actual photon needed?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: Dredd
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: Dredd
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Why it seems like an annus miserables for Relativity this year?
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: Dredd
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: Dredd
• Re: The reptility of our teachers
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: Dredd
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Rup
• Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Vakium
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Big Picture of GR
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Does Relativity the universe expanding in nothingness?
  • From: Vakium
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Inconsistent Relativity which evaporate
  • From: Vakium
• Why it seems like an annus miserables for Relativity this year?
  • From: Vakium
• Re: They force me to learn and not understand relativity in this vacation
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The reptility of our teachers
  • From: Vakium
• Re: They force me to learn and not understand relativity in this vacation
  • From: Vakium
• Re: They force me to learn and not understand relativity in this vacation
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The reptility of our teachers
  • From: Greg Neill
• The reptility of our teachers
  • From: Vakium
• They force me to learn and not understand relativity in this vacation
  • From: Vakium
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What's wrong with Pete M. Brown solution?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: The Slaughter of Special Relativity - Final Moments
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Universal Velocity 1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: Dono
• (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Universal Velocity 1
  • From: BURT
• Re: Universal Velocity 1
  • From: xxein
• Re: The Slaughter of Special Relativity - Final Moments
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time dilation of muons is due to quantum Zeno effect through aether
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Slaughter of Special Relativity - Final Moments
  • From: Ptrezby
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: The Slaughter of Special Relativity - Final Moments
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Slaughter of Special Relativity - Final Moments
  • From: Ptrezby
• Re: Time dilation of muons is due to quantum Zeno effect through aether
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Gerald Ray
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Time dilation of muons is due to quantum Zeno effect through aether
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Time dilation of muons is due to quantum Zeno effect through aether
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation of muons is due to quantum Zeno effect through aether
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Time dilation of muons is due to quantum Zeno effect through aether
  • From: Dono
• Re: Time dilation of muons is due to quantum Zeno effect through aether
  • From: Albertito
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: Time dilation of muons is due to quantum Zeno effect through aether
  • From: Albertito
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Time dilation of muons is due to quantum Zeno effect through aether
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Time dilation of muons is due to quantum Zeno effect through aether
  • From: Albertito
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Time dilation of muons is due to quantum Zeno effect through aether
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Time dilation of muons is due to quantum Zeno effect through aether
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Slaughter of Special Relativity - Final Moments
  • From: luke . saul
• Time dilation of muons is due to quantum Zeno effect through aether
  • From: Albertito
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: PD
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Rup
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Clock hypothesis ( non heuristic )
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Black hole Paradigm shift leading to a TOE.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: PD
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Black hole Paradigm shift leading to a TOE.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Request for Review of a pre-print book titled, "Fundamental Nature of Matter and Fields"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Black hole Paradigm shift leading to a TOE.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Clock hypothesis ( non heuristic )
  • From: Imago Mortis
• Re: The Slaughter of Special Relativity - Final Moments
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Slaughter of Special Relativity - Final Moments
  • From: Sue...
• Re: alive ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Sue...
• alive ?
  • From: significant zero
• Re: The Slaughter of Special Relativity - Final Moments
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Slaughter of Special Relativity - Final Moments
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Slaughter of Special Relativity - Final Moments
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• The Slaughter of Special Relativity - Final Moments
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: PD
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: On Guidelines
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• On Guidelines
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Request for Review of a pre-print book titled, "Fundamental Nature of Matter and Fields"
  • From: lithium
• Re: Articles on Mathematics
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: PD
• Articles on Mathematics
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: PD
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: DeadKooksRus
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Rup
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: PD
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: Request for Review of a pre-print book titled, "Fundamental Nature of Matter and Fields"
  • From: PD
• Re: Request for Review of a pre-print book titled, "Fundamental Nature of Matter and Fields"
  • From: jem
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is relativity still not ready for me yet?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is relativity still not ready for me yet?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is relativity still not ready for me yet?
  • From: blackhead
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: PD
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Is relativity still not ready for me yet?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is relativity still not ready for me yet?
  • From: blackhead
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: Is relativity still not ready for me yet?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is relativity still not ready for me yet?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is relativity still not ready for me yet?
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: Universal Velocity 1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Another Invariant
  • From: DeadKooksRus
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Universal Velocity 1
  • From: xxein
• Re: Another Invariant
  • From: Pmb
• Another Invariant
  • From: DeadKooksRus
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Advantages of directive newsgroups
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: harry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Request for Review of a pre-print book titled, "Fundamental Nature of Matter and Fields"
  • From: PD
• Re: Welcome to Basti Newsgroups (sites)
  • From: litsohate
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Request for Review of a pre-print book titled, "Fundamental Nature of Matter and Fields"
  • From: harry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Request for Review of a pre-print book titled, "Fundamental Nature of Matter and Fields"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Rup
• Re: Universal Velocity 1
  • From: fjmr
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cyclotron frequency, chaotic systems and relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Cyclotron frequency, chaotic systems and relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cyclotron frequency, chaotic systems and relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Cyclotron frequency, chaotic systems and relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Seju Strich
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What's wrong with Pete M. Brown solution?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What's wrong with Pete M. Brown solution?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Cyclotron frequency, chaotic systems and relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's wrong with Pete M. Brown solution?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Cyclotron frequency, chaotic systems and relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What's wrong with Pete M. Brown solution?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What's wrong with Pete M. Brown solution?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's wrong with Pete M. Brown solution?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Jerry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Jerry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Welcome to Basti Newsgroups (sites)
  • From: Jamie
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: I am retarded, are black holes length contracted in only one direction?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What's wrong with Pete M. Brown solution?
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Jerry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Seju Strich
• Welcome to Basti Newsgroups (sites)
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: PD
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: harry
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: PD
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Basti Newsgroup (Math or Physics)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Basti Newsgroup (Math or Physics)
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: What's wrong with Pete M. Brown solution?
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: What's wrong with Pete M. Brown solution?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat
  • From: Seju Strich
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: What's wrong with Pete M. Brown solution?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What's wrong with Pete M. Brown solution?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: Cyclotron frequency, chaotic systems and relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cyclotron frequency, chaotic systems and relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Cyclotron frequency, chaotic systems and relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: What's wrong with Pete M. Brown solution?
  • From: Dono
• Re: What's wrong with Pete M. Brown solution?
  • From: Dono
• Re: What's wrong with Pete M. Brown solution?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What's wrong with Pete M. Brown solution?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Cyclotron frequency, chaotic systems and relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Cyclotron frequency, chaotic systems and relativity
  • From: Albertito
• What's wrong with Pete M. Brown solution?
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: Cyclotron frequency, chaotic systems and relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Seju Strich
• Re: Cyclotron frequency, chaotic systems and relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cyclotron frequency, chaotic systems and relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Cyclotron frequency, chaotic systems and relativity
  • From: Albertito
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: xxein
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: xxein
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Universal Velocity 1
  • From: xxein
• Re: To learn and not understand relativity in this vacation
  • From: xxein
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Dono
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Dono
• To learn and not understand relativity in this vacation
  • From: Vakium
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: I am retarded, are black holes length contracted in only one direction?
  • From: Vakium
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Gravity is not geometry, here is the proof
  • From: Vakium
• Re: Gravity is not geometry, here is the proof
  • From: Vakium
• Re: I am illiterate, is relativity for me?
  • From: Vakium
• Is relativity still not ready for me yet?
  • From: Vakium
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: dlzc
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The roots of Lorentz invariance prove its inconsistency
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: I am illiterate, is relativity for me?
  • From: PD
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: I am illiterate, is relativity for me?
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: I am retarded, are black holes length contracted in only one direction?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: I am illiterate, is relativity for me?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: Universal Velocity 1
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Universal Velocity 1
  • From: Androcles
• Universal Velocity 1
  • From: fjmr
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Rup
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Contact email for Basti Newsgroups
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: I am illiterate, is relativity for me?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Gravity is not geometry, here is the proof
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Application for membership (Physics)
  • From: Dono
• Application for membership (Physics)
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: The roots of Lorentz invariance prove its inconsistency
  • From: Igor
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Dono
• Re: frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• frequency and wave length as they relate to relativity of time
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Space acceleration and the gravity of the whole
  • From: BURT
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: Gravity is not geometry, here is the proof
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: I am retarded, are black holes length contracted in only one direction?
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: ron_aikas
• Re: I am retarded, are black holes length contracted in only one direction?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: ron_aikas
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Universe's lifespan?
  • From: Androcles
• Gravity is not geometry, here is the proof
  • From: Vakium
• Re: Universe's lifespan?
  • From: Vakium
• I am retarded, are black holes length contracted in only one direction?
  • From: Vakium
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Raghar
• I am illiterate, is relativity for me?
  • From: Vakium
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: PD
• Re: Universe's lifespan?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The roots of Lorentz invariance prove its inconsistency
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: dlzc
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Universe's lifespan?
  • From: Derik
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Aether Question on Magnetic Force on Electric Charge.
  • From: Vern
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The roots of Lorentz invariance prove its inconsistency
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: dlzc
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: dlzc
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: dlzc
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Rup
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The roots of Lorentz invariance prove its inconsistency
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The roots of Lorentz invariance prove its inconsistency
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The roots of Lorentz invariance prove its inconsistency
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The roots of Lorentz invariance prove its inconsistency
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The roots of Lorentz invariance prove its inconsistency
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The roots of Lorentz invariance prove its inconsistency
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The roots of Lorentz invariance prove its inconsistency
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The roots of Lorentz invariance prove its inconsistency
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• The roots of Lorentz invariance prove its inconsistency
  • From: Albertito
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Application for membership
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Basti Newsgroup
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: Basti Newsgroup
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Application for membership
  • From: kp
• Application for membership
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Dono
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Basti Newsgroup
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Basti Newsgroup
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: jem
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: kenseto
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Nuo
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: Basti Newsgroup
  • From: Dono
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: jem
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Beautiful Formula
  • From: Dono
• Re: Beautiful Formula
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Relation between my work on Newtonian limits and Ilja work on quantum Einstein hole argument
  • From: Dono
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: jem
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Beautiful Formula
  • From: Dono
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: jem
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Beautiful Formula
  • From: Albertito
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relation between my work on Newtonian limits and Ilja work on quantum Einstein hole argument
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Basti Newsgroup
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Dark Energy and Photon Dispersion of Gamma Rays
  • From: K_h
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Darwin123
• New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Basti Newsgroup
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Basti Newsgroup
  • From: Dono
• Basti Newsgroup
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ohh dear, they can't even measure light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Dono
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is there anything wrong with this canonical commutation calculation? (KP where are you?)
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Dono
• "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Nuo
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is there anything wrong with this canonical commutation calculation? (KP where are you?)
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Relation between my work on Newtonian limits and Ilja work on quantum Einstein hole argument
  • From: Juan R.
• Ohh dear, they can't even measure light
  • From: Bruckner
• Ohh dear, they can't even measure light
  • From: Bruckner
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is there anything wrong with this canonical commutation calculation? (KP where are you?)
  • From: kp
• Re: Relation between my work on Newtonian limits and Ilja work on quantum Einstein hole argument
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Relation between my work on Newtonian limits and Ilja work on quantum Einstein hole argument
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Generalization of Minkowski Space-Time
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: jem
• Re: A Generalization of Minkowski Space-Time
  • From: xxein
• Re: Is vacuum empty or full with dielectricum?
  • From: Bruckner
• Re: Comment on NAND gates.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Generalization of Minkowski Space-Time
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Dead Paul
• The ether isn't all washed up.
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: Comment on NAND gates.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Comment on NAND gates.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Is vacuum empty or full with dielectricum?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Comment on NAND gates.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is there anything wrong with this canonical commutation calculation? (KP where are you?)
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Dono
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Beautiful Formula
  • From: fjmr
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is there anything wrong with this canonical commutation calculation? (KP where are you?)
  • From: kp
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• cheap discount af1 x jordans i ii iii fusion shoes dunk
  • From: shoeshivex
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Dono
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Nuo
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: jem
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Comment on NAND gates.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Dono
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Juan R.
• Where will we get our energy from in the future?.
  • From: srividya
• Can plastic store electricity?.
  • From: srividya
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Comment on NAND gates.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Is there anything wrong with this canonical commutation calculation? (KP where are you?)
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is vacuum empty or full with dielectricum?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Are GPS errors because relativity?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are GPS errors because relativity?
  • From: xxein
• Re: A Generalization of Minkowski Space-Time
  • From: xxein
• Re: A Generalization of Minkowski Space-Time
  • From: Androcles
• A Generalization of Minkowski Space-Time
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Is vacuum empty or full with dielectricum?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is vacuum empty or full with dielectricum?
  • From: OG
• Re: New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Dono
• New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy Alliance Conference
  • From: Dono
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Is vacuum empty or full with dielectricum?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Are GPS errors because relativity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is vacuum empty or full with dielectricum?
  • From: Bruckner
• Are GPS errors because relativity?
  • From: Bruckner
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is vacuum empty or full with dielectricum?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Dono
• Is vacuum empty or full with dielectricum?
  • From: Bruckner
• Re: age/size of universe
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: age/size of universe
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Dono
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Nuo
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Time. /My opinion./
  • From: socratus
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Dono
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Alen
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Could be that Einestin's Photo-Electric Engine is wrong?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Where is the electron getting his charge from?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: I got a cool definition of time
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Dono
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Dono
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Nuo
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Alen
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Dono
• Re: Was Einestin wrong in his Photo Electric Model?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Where is the electron getting his charge from?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: I got a cool definition of time
  • From: Pmb
• Intrinsic geometry comment, from SPF.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: 15-page book of mine elucidates Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Sue...
• Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: bz
• Re: age/size of universe
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: age/size of universe
  • From: Tom Roberts
• New analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals a real signal.
  • From: Surfer
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Nuo
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: 15-page book of mine elucidates Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: bz
• Time. /My opinion./
  • From: socratus
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Divided intuition: Einstein's Elimination of T and Hoyle's direct action of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: 15-page book of mine elucidates Relativity
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Divided intuition: Einstein's Elimination of T and Hoyle's direct action of gravity
  • From: babaluyee
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: I got a cool definition of time
  • From: xxein
• Re: I got a cool definition of time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: I got a cool definition of time
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• I got a cool definition of time
  • From: fluffy cupcake
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Dono
• Re: age/size of universe
  • From: dlzc
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Could be that Einestin's Photo-Electric Engine is wrong?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Dono
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• age/size of universe
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Where is the electron getting his charge from?
  • From: Bruckner
• Re: Could be that Einestin's Photo-Electric Engine is wrong?
  • From: Bruckner
• Re: Could be that Einestin's Photo-Electric Engine is wrong?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Could be that Einestin's Photo-Electric Engine is wrong?
  • From: Bruckner
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Dono
• Re: Could be that Einestin's Photo-Electric Engine is wrong?
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Dono
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Dono
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Nuo
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Who is who?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Is temperature relative?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Is temperature relative?
  • From: developereo
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Could be that Einestin's Photo-Electric Engine is wrong?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Could be that Einestin's Photo-Electric Engine is wrong?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Simultaneity problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Yuancur
• Could be that Einestin's Photo-Electric Engine is wrong?
  • From: Bruckner
• Was Einestin wrong in his Photo Electric Model?
  • From: Pepe
• Was Einestin wrong in his Photo Electric Model?
  • From: Pepe
• Is Relativity an inverse of a theory?
  • From: Pepe
• Relativity violates 2nd Law of Thermo-dynamics in only one direction?
  • From: Pepe
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Ino
• Re: Generalized Kepler's Second Law and Lorentz factor
  • From: Dono
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Note on CPT.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Generalized Kepler's Second Law and Lorentz factor
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The Untestable Einstein
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• More canonical commutation questions
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: What error bars in relativity GPS ?
  • From: xxein
• Re: The Untestable Einstein
  • From: Dono
• The Untestable Einstein
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: xxein
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is relativity about science or cooking?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• PRIVATE PHYSICS 15
  • From: karamihas
• Re: Generalized Kepler's Second Law and Lorentz factor
  • From: Dono
• Re: About Albert Einstine
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• "Gravity"
  • From: Ino
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: About Albert Einstine
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Albertito
• About Albert Einstine
  • From: Chiku
• Re: Generalized Kepler's Second Law and Lorentz factor
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Ultimate Reality is both simple and complicated!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Generalized Kepler's Second Law and Lorentz factor
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Ultimate Reality is both simple and complicated!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: xxein
• Re: What error bars in relativity GPS ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What error bars in relativity GPS ?
  • From: xxein
• Is relativity about science or cooking?
  • From: Pepe
• What error bars in relativity GPS ?
  • From: Pepe
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ultimate Reality is both simple and complicated!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: bz
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: bz
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: bz
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Ino
• Re: Rotations in spacetime
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Dono
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Dono
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ultimate Reality is both simple and complicated!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: bz
• Mercury's perihelion precession and the reason why GR is badly wrong
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ultimate Reality is both simple and complicated!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Howie Buhlers
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: Yuancur
• Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Re: Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: bz
• Re: 15-page book of mine elucidates Relativity
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: 15-page book of mine elucidates Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: 15-page book of mine elucidates Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: [OT] Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: [OT] Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: 15-page book of mine elucidates Relativity
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: 15-page book of mine elucidates Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: PD
• Re: Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Howie Buhlers
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Ino
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: 15-page book of mine elucidates Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Are OHMS invariant?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: 15-page book of mine elucidates Relativity
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Masters Essay topic
  • From: athan
• Re: Ultimate Reality is both simple and complicated!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: 2633 Solutions manuals
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Howie Buhlers
• Re: Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Canonical Commutators, Rest Mass Commutation, and Dirac's Equation
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Generalized Kepler's Second Law and Lorentz factor
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: 2633 Solutions manuals
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: Androcles
• AETHER: The Physicalists' God
  • From: Laurent
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: harry
• Re: Ultimate Reality is both simple and complicated!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ultimate Reality is both simple and complicated!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: PD
• "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Ino
• Re: Ultimate Reality is both simple and complicated!
  • From: harry
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Ultimate Reality is both simple and complicated!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: harry
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: harry
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: Eric Gisse
• 2633 Solutions manuals
  • From: BERGH
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativistic Doppler shift off moving mirrors
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativistic Doppler shift off moving mirrors
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativistic Doppler shift off moving mirrors
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativistic Doppler shift off moving mirrors
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Howie Buhlers
• Ultimate Reality is both simple and complicated!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: YBM
• Re: Questiona and thoughts about CO2
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: xxein
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: PD
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: YBM
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Questiona and thoughts about CO2
  • From: bz
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Androcles
• Relativistic Doppler shift off moving mirrors
  • From: Dono
• Questiona and thoughts about CO2
  • From: Jimmy
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Howie Buhlers
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Ino
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: PD
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Absolute speed
  • From: Phil
• Re: Schwarzschild solution on finite manifold
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Schwarzschild solution on finite manifold
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Dono
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Schwarzschild solution on finite manifold
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: andrewgeorges93
• Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: SEAZSky
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: xxein
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: xxein
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Generalized Kepler's Second Law and Lorentz factor
  • From: xxein
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: dlzc
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: xxein
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: PD
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Dono
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Rotations in spacetime
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Dono
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Dono
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Uni
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: ron_aikas
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Ino
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: ron_aikas
• Re: What black hole length contracted in only one direction?
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: ron_aikas
• Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: Lloyd
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: ron_aikas
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: PD
• Re: Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: What black hole length contracted in only one direction?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: PD
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Dono
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Generalized Kepler's Second Law and Lorentz factor
  • From: Dono
• Generalized Kepler's Second Law and Lorentz factor
  • From: Albertito
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Dono
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Dono
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Rotations in spacetime
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Schwarzschild solution on finite manifold
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Odd derivation of the GR gravitational shift formula
  • From: mluttgens
• Ryhmän sfnet.harrastus.ruoka+juoma.olut virallinen kuvaus
  • From: Reko Kokkonen
• Re: Schwarzschild solution on finite manifold
  • From: Jan Irigi Olsina
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Are black holes possible to do in reality?
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Why AB does not equal BA
  • From: Thomas Heger
• The reason why AB is different from BA
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: EARN DOLLARS AT HOME BASED BUSINESS
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• How does the angle between two vectors transform in SR?
  • From: Dono
• Why AB does not equal BA
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: force of gravity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Alen
• Re: Why AB does not equal BA
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Why AB does not equal BA
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Now they have time before Big Bang!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Schwarzschild solution on finite manifold
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Now they have time before Big Bang!
  • From: Eqn
• Re: Now they have time before Big Bang!
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Now they have time before Big Bang!
  • From: Eqn
• Re: Now they have time before Big Bang!
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Now they have time before Big Bang!
  • From: Eqn
• Re: Are black holes possible to do in reality?
  • From: Eqn
• Re: Odd derivation of the GR gravitational shift formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are black holes possible to do in reality?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: on the direction of physics today.
  • From: Eqn
• Are black holes possible to do in reality?
  • From: ossosso
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Sue...
• What black hole length contracted in only one direction?
  • From: ossosso
• on the direction of physics today.
  • From: babaluyee
• Re: Kardaanivetoiset fillarit
  • From: Fracasserò Ferdinando
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: online money
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: force of gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein was wrong!
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: PD
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: PD
• force of gravity
  • From: miss_amy
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Alen
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Alen
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Please Sir, I don't understand relativity #1
  • From: PD
• Re: Odd derivation of the GR gravitational shift formula
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Odd derivation of the GR gravitational shift formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Odd derivation of the GR gravitational shift formula
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: kp
• Re: Analysis of gas mode MM interferometer operation using standard SR formulae.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Einstein was wrong!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein was wrong!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Odd derivation of the GR gravitational shift formula
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Odd derivation of the GR gravitational shift formula
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Odd derivation of the GR gravitational shift formula
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Dawkins-Myers-Randi Corp.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Alen
• Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS 14
  • From: karamihas
• Re: Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Falling Gyroscope? (Tucker from SPF).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Rotations in spacetime
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Einstein was wrong!
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS 14
  • From: Dono
• Re: Odd derivation of the GR gravitational shift formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS 14
  • From: karamihas
• Re: Odd derivation of the GR gravitational shift formula
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Einstein was wrong!
  • From: The Jackal
• Re: Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: kp
• Reconciling several views of the electron wavefunction
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Derivation of mass-energy equivalence formula and energy-momentum relation under Galilean relativity equipped with a specific rule for Doppler shifts
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Derivation of mass-energy equivalence formula and energy-momentum relation under Galilean relativity equipped with a specific rule for Doppler shifts
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Derivation of mass-energy equivalence formula and energy-momentum relation under Galilean relativity equipped with a specific rule for Doppler shifts
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Alen
• Re: Please Sir, I don't understand relativity #1
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: PD
• Re: Derivation of mass-energy equivalence formula and energy-momentum relation under Galilean relativity equipped with a specific rule for Doppler shifts
  • From: Dono
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Uni
• Relativistic point dynamics
  • From: Imago Mortis
• Re: Rotations in spacetime
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Schwarzschild solution on finite manifold
  • From: Jan Irigi Olšina
• Re: Derivation of mass-energy equivalence formula and energy-momentum relation under Galilean relativity equipped with a specific rule for Doppler shifts
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Odd derivation of the GR gravitational shift formula
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Odd derivation of the GR gravitational shift formula
  • From: mluttgens
• Derivation of mass-energy equivalence formula and energy-momentum relation under Galilean relativity equipped with a specific rule for Doppler shifts
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Please Sir, I don't understand relativity #1
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cosmological horizons, and a sceptic's view of special and general relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Its time to BEGIN BELIEVING again!
  • From: The Jackal
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Supernovae
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: xxein
• Re: PRIVATE PHYSICS 14
  • From: xxein
• Re: Rotations in spacetime
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• PRIVATE PHYSICS 14
  • From: karamihas
• "Space, Vacuum, and the Aether"
  • From: Uni
• Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: Uni
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: PD
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Alen
• Re: Rotations in spacetime
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: kp
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: PD
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: PD
• Re: Rotations in spacetime
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: time dilation
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Link to Kopeikin's colloquium at Fermilab
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Link to Kopeikin's colloquium at Fermilab
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Deer hypocritical cretin Smiffy fails to report his abuse of Pentcho Valev.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Cosmological horizons, and a sceptic's view of special and general relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Alen
• Re: Cosmological horizons, and a sceptic's view of special and general relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Cosmological horizons, and a sceptic's view of special and general relativity
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Please Sir, I don't understand relativity #1
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Slim light box,light panel--http://www.edlite.hk
  • From: jenny
• Re: Intelligent Design
  • From: xxein
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Odd derivation of the GR gravitational shift formula
  • From: xxein
• Re: Odd derivation of the GR gravitational shift formula
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Please Sir, I don't understand relativity #1
  • From: Darwin123
• Odd derivation of the GR gravitational shift formula
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Cosmological horizons, and a sceptic's view of special and general relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Intelligent Design
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Cosmological horizons, and a sceptic's view of special and general relativity
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: PD
• Re: Cosmological horizons, and a sceptic's view of special and general relativity
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Cosmological horizons, and a sceptic's view of special and general relativity
  • From: dlzc
• Cheap POLO BOSS T-shirts, Seven Gina Green Global Jean, etc
  • From: sunglassescheap
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: kp
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: kp
• Re: Christoffel symbols
  • From: Imago Mortis
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: kp
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Alen
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Walk to wrong ideas (E/=mc2)
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Christoffel symbols
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: harry
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: kp
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: kp
• Re: Christoffel symbols
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Christoffel symbols
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Christoffel symbols
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Link to Kopeikin's colloquium at Fermilab
  • From: Melroy
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: greysky
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Alen
• Cosmological horizons, and a sceptic's view of special and general relativity
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: Please Sir, I don't understand relativity #1
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: PD
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Please Sir, I don't understand relativity #1
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Walk to wrong ideas (E/=mc2)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Full Nexus between Newtonian and Relativistic Mechanics
  • From: gsardincharles
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: ron_aikas
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Christoffel symbols
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Walk to wrong ideas (E/=mc2)
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Walk to wrong ideas (E/=mc2)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Christoffel symbols
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: PD
• Re: Christoffel symbols
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Walk to wrong ideas (E/=mc2)
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Walk to wrong ideas (E/=mc2)
  • From: PD
• Re: Walk of wrong ideas (E/=mc2)
  • From: Dono
• Walk of wrong ideas (E/=mc2)
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Walk to wrong ideas (E/=mc2)
  • From: Dono
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Alen
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Walk to wrong ideas (E/=mc2)
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Walk to wrong ideas (E/=mc2)
  • From: Dono
• Walk to wrong ideas (E/=mc2)
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Definition of point in quantum physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Rotations in spacetime
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: PD
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: luke . saul
• Christoffel symbols
  • From: Imago Mortis
• Re: "Causality"
  • From: SolomonW
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: harry
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Please Sir, I don't understand relativity #1
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: harry
• Re: Please Sir, I don't understand relativity #1
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Please Sir, I don't understand relativity #1
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Definition of point in quantum physics
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Definition of point in quantum physics
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Please Sir, I don't understand relativity #1
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Definition of point in quantum physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: xxein
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Please Sir, I don't understand relativity #1
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: harry
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: Androcles
• Doppler shift vs second postulate
  • From: ron_aikas
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Full Nexus between Newtonian and Relativistic Mechanics
  • From: YBM
• Definition of point in quantum physics
  • From: Victor Bushkov
• Re: big bang would violate the equivalence principle
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Full Nexus between Newtonian and Relativistic Mechanics
  • From: gsardin
• Re: Basic Relativity Question from a Beginner
  • From: PD
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: luke . saul
• Re: The Zeeman Effect. /My opinion/.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Basic Relativity Question from a Beginner
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: Juan R.
• "Causality"
  • From: Uni
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: harry
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: harry
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: John Park
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: PD
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: big bang would violate the equivalence principle
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: big bang would violate the equivalence principle
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Please Sir, I don't understand relativity #1
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: PD
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Zeeman Effect. /My opinion/.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Basic Relativity Question from a Beginner
  • From: PD
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: PD
• Re: big bang would violate the equivalence principle
  • From: PD
• Re: Basic Relativity Question from a Beginner
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Albertito
• "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Uni
• Re: Please Sir, I don't understand relativity #1
  • From: PD
• Re: What a Joke QM Is
  • From: harry
• Re: Absence of Newtonian limit of General Relativity and dark matter issue in spf, speed of gravity issue
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Whjat is the minimum Temperature Possible?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: big bang would violate the equivalence principle
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Please Sir, I don't understand relativity #1
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: New Explanation of Hyperfine Splitting in Hydrogen's n = 1 Shell
  • From: Steve Bell
• What a Joke QM Is
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: BURT
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: big bang would violate the equivalence principle
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: big bang would violate the equivalence principle
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: big bang would violate the equivalence principle
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Basic Relativity Question from a Beginner
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Basic Relativity Question from a Beginner
  • From: PD
• Re: Please Sir, I don't understand relativity #1
  • From: PD
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: PD
• Re: A twin paradox simulation
  • From: PD
• Re: Whjat is the minimum Temperature Possible?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Absence of Newtonian limit of General Relativity and dark matter issue in spf, speed of gravity issue
  • From: Juan R.
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Kro
• Re: Michelson-Morley interferometer without a length contraction.
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Whjat is the minimum Temperature Possible?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: Juan R.
• The Zeeman Effect. /My opinion/.
  • From: socratus
• The sound of gravity as dreamed by Johannes Kepler
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A twin paradox simulation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: New Explanation of Hyperfine Splitting in Hydrogen's n = 1 Shell
  • From: Eric Gisse
• New Explanation of Hyperfine Splitting in Hydrogen's n = 1 Shell
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: big bang would violate the equivalence principle
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: big bang would violate the equivalence principle
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Absence of Newtonian limit of General Relativity and dark matter issue in spf, speed of gravity issue
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A relativity time dilation information paradox?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Basic Relativity Question from a Beginner
  • From: kenseto
• Re: big bang would violate the equivalence principle
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)