Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy

On Jun 18, 5:55 am, mluttg...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jun 18, 6:46 am, Dono <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Jun 17, 5:17 am, mluttg...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Jun 17, 12:51 am, Dono <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 16, 3:06 pm, mluttg...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
<repeated imbecilities snipped>

So, following the same logic, if the clocks deployed in space were to
return on Earth, the same exact effect would be observed. The one
correctly predicted by GR, the theory that you try in vain to dispute,
old fart!

Durak! In a correct experiment, no difference would be
observed between clocks brought back on Earth and
Earth clocks. The frequency shift of GPS clocks is
a mere observational artefact, that should not be
interpreted as due to a physical effect on the ticking rate
of orbiting clocks.

Marcel Luttgens

The Alzheimer pills, Marcel, don't forget to take your Alzheimer
pills :-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Fromhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gps:

"For the GPS satellites, general relativity
predicts that the atomic clocks at GPS orbital altitudes
will tick more rapidly, by about 45.9 microseconds (µs)
per day, because they are in a weaker gravitational field
than atomic clocks on Earth's surface. Special relativity
predicts that atomic clocks moving at GPS orbital speeds
will tick more slowly than stationary ground clocks by
about 7.2 µs per day. When combined, the discrepancy is
about 38 microseconds per day; a difference of 4.465
parts in 10^10.[27].
To account for this, the frequency standard onboard
each satellite is given a rate offset prior to launch,
making it run slightly slower than the desired frequency
on Earth; specifically, at 10.22999999543 MHz instead
of 10.23 MHz.[28] Since the atomic clocks on board the
GPS satellites are precisely tuned, it makes the system
a practical engineering application of the scientific
theory of relativity in a real-world environment."

Now let a = 10.22999999543, b = 10.23
Then ((b-a)/b) * 10^10 = 4.467, which corresponds to
the difference of 4.465 parts in 10^10.

So, the offset given once *prior* to launch permanently
compensates for the relativistic effects of 38
microseconds per day, meaning that those effects don't
accumulate, in other words that clock rates are not
physically affected by gravity and/or velocity.

Dear Marcel, dear unrepenting imbecile

By offsetting the frequency of the clocks deployed on the GPS
satellites, the engineers who designed the GP system are ofsetting
precisely the GR effect you are stubbornly denying.
You are a very funny clown, old fart :-)



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: GR frequency shift formula
    ... Light emitted from the Sun's surface observed on Earth: ... 'Light emitted from a satellite orbiting at 20200 km from the Earth ... the satellite based and Earth based clocks in the gravitational field. ... The correction for the GPS would also include a difference in period ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
    ... return on Earth, the same exact effect would be observed. ... Earth clocks. ... "For the GPS satellites, general relativity ... the offset given once *prior* to launch permanently ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
    ... return on Earth, the same exact effect would be observed. ... Earth clocks. ... The frequency shift of GPS clocks is ... effects did accumulate over time (which the GPS proves ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Stick to the planes for now
    ... One clock flew in western direction around the earth, ... "time delation" as predicted by Einstein's theories of Relativity. ... The atomic clocks onboard the planes ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Accuracy of NTP - Advice Needed
    ... how do you think they keep those atomic clocks synchronized? ... they use GPS to compare the clocks to each other. ... One of the articles I read even identified the GPS receiver they use. ... Making these measurements simultaneously at both ...
    (comp.protocols.time.ntp)