Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: "Pmb" <peter.m.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 05:50:18 -0400
"Juan R. González-Álvarez" <juanREMOVE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:pan.2008.06.25.09.27.54@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tom Roberts wrote on Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:18:52 +0200:
I don't have "geometrical views on gravitation", I have geometrical
views on GENERAL RELATIVITY.
My quote was precise. It is applicable each time you state that spacetime
is curved [unproven], that curvature was measured [untrue], that there is
no force of gravity [unreal], when you lie novices about the geometry on
fiber bundle formulation of quantum fields...
Because that theory is, in essence,
geometrical, regardless of whether or not there are other
interpretations of it.
Nope. Even Einstein himself disagreed with that kind of thinking!
Pete
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Juan R.
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- References:
- New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Pmb
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: harry
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Juan R.
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Juan R.
- New version of a relativity FAQ
- Prev by Date: Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- Next by Date: Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- Previous by thread: Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- Next by thread: Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|