Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: "Juan R." González-Álvarez <juanREMOVE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:59:47 +0200 (CEST)
Pmb wrote on Wed, 25 Jun 2008 05:17:21 -0400:
"Juan R. González-Álvarez" <juanREMOVE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote inmsg/3e85302f61a6aae3
message news:pan.2008.06.25.09.03.03@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Pmb wrote on Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:26:01 -0400:
General question (not necessarily to David): Has Dono accepted my
challenge? :)
Pete, you already met Dono previously and he lied you. But then Dono
was using another nickname.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/
d5d8d8561738eba3
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/
Dono continues using the same old tactics and insults as then and would
caught now.
Whoa! Are you saying that Dono and Bilge are one in the same person?
Don't sure about that because once Dono simulated be a hundred of
different people before being caught in public by group administrators.
But Dono is the same Karandash saying nonsense about potentials energy
and you correcting all them (Bilge, Bill Hobba, Eric Gisse, Kanrandash-
Dono) at once in that thread.
The own Dono recognized he is Karandash a few days ago when i put a
simple trap to him.
You already had a bunch of discussion with Dono (aka Karandash) on the
topic of relativistic mass. He is using now the same 'arguments' like
that of "massless photons"
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/a34886e54628677e
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/d5d7d4c133c836e8
that Dono (aka Karandash) used in the past
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/8376b187b2893a2d
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/d97567213c1a51d7
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/95050b81f3f5d5c5
He is lying you again Pete. Have care.
You also asked then, "is karandash and androcles one in the same person?"
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/99288021878f57c5
Since Karandash is Dono, the question is today: are Dono and androcles
the same person?
Dir has also asked to dono: "Are you Androcles in disguise?"
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/a133d3ab0c7dab89
and after reading Dono reply then assured that Dono acts exactly as
Androcles:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/2995518406a7977e
Maybe then bilge Karandash dono and androcles are the same person i don't
know.
I am helping you on this bizarre stuff of who he is because you kindly
help when I was attacked.
My advice is that you would just ignore him and others and continue with
your work.
--
Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)
http://canonicalscience.org
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- References:
- New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Pmb
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: harry
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: harry
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: harry
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Pmb
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: dlzc
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Pmb
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: dlzc
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Pmb
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Pmb
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Juan R.
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Pmb
- New version of a relativity FAQ
- Prev by Date: Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- Next by Date: Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- Previous by thread: Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- Next by thread: Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|