Re: New version of a relativity FAQ

On Jun 26, 3:39 am, "Juan R." González-Álvarez
<juanREM...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote on Wed, 25 Jun 2008 05:32:45 -0700:

(snip)

You may correct your mistakes and learn some physics or you may continue
by that way, you choose.

--
Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)  http://canonicalscience.org

Another irrelevant reply.

If you don't want to explain why you are going through the google
archive and deleting your posts, just don't reply.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Explaining Time Dilation
    ... >> SNIP ... > presumably 'non math construct'. ... > agree with Newtonian physics) and G = T a math construct. ... However science does not deal ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: NoEinstein Finds Yet Another Reason Why SR Bites-the-Dust!
    ... Science CORRECTS the mistakes of the past, and calls those physics ... his bite regarding anything to do with actual SCIENCE ... We all know that john mistakes quantity for quality. ... are a zillion, zillion x-rays traveling "close' to 'c', then all of ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Space Policy Sucks, while theres Life on Venus
    ... I believe that honest physics and science needs lots of funding ... of imposing at least several trillion dollars/euros worth of this 9/11 ... that they and their government never once made any mistakes, ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: Space Policy Sucks, while theres Life on Venus
    ... I believe that honest physics and science needs lots of funding ... of imposing at least several trillion dollars/euros worth of this 9/11 ... that they and their government never once made any mistakes, ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: the two slits versus schrodingers cat
    ... > 2) Experimental physics has nothing to do with applied physics. ... view from which we can define the goals of science), ... dimensions to dimensions to dimensions it *looks like* we're able to unify 2 ...
    (sci.physics)
Loading