Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 26, 3:57 pm, "Pmb" <some...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d84558a0-8f3a-45d5-b9ef-db44eac082bb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Pete is either ignorant (and shouldn't be commenting) or stupid (and
definitely shouldn't be commenting) when he says that GR is not a
geometric theory of gravity.
Sheesh! What an arrogant closed minded person you are. Are you so unable to
fathom that this view is quite legitimate?
No more than I am unable to fathom the view that the sky is yellow.
Sure I could imagine it if it were true, it doesn't make it any more
true.
You can have your own opinions but you can't have your own facts.
[snip whining]
.
- References:
- New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Pmb
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Juan R.
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Juan R.
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Juan R.
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Juan R.
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- From: Pmb
- New version of a relativity FAQ
- Prev by Date: Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- Next by Date: Re: Universal Velocity 1
- Previous by thread: Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- Next by thread: Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- Index(es):