Re: New version of a relativity FAQ

Daryl McCullough wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:17:10 -0700:

Juan R. says...

Daryl McCullough wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:56:20 -0700:

That's why I asked "How so?". I'm asking you how they are not
equivalent.

Ask Eric

I asked you. You were the one who claimed that they are not equivalent.
Why did you claim that?

Because as many others before I studied NC and NG. But I am not going to
start an useless discussion with you on that.

If you did the claim that both are equivalent, that may be simply taken
as meaning that you never studied the details of both theories as the
causal structure or n-body correlations (functions with time implicit
dependence).

A detailed discussion would be too time demanding for me and would depart
from this thread.

--
Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)
http://canonicalscience.org
.