Re: New version of a relativity FAQ

Eric Gisse wrote on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 05:48:43 -0700:

On Jun 26, 11:16 pm, "Juan R." González-Álvarez
<juanREM...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Pmb wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:59:58 -0400:

You want to play with the big boys and you don't even understand the
math that you're trying to use.

A few time ago, He pretended to review a research topic about geodesics
in spf, but was rapidly noticed he did not know how to differentiate
T_ab!

He never learn the lesson.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/
msg/0ab17ed15130a755?dmode=source

Selective memory or lying? I cannot tell.

You are *so clever* that pretend to lye about a mistake from you, which
is stored on-line!

Your above link (I did *not* check your tensor indices) is the reply you
wrote *after* I said you that you were deriving the tensor in a *wrong*
way

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/b40f637f3c1be6ec

You can see the text in my message being quoted in the first link you
introduced above :-)

I was speaking about spf. This was the history on spf.

First I noticed you were deriving wrong T_ab

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.foundations/msg/
c14971322fbd9b3c

In your usual arrogant and ill-informed attitude you replied

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.foundations/
msg/712eef5eb651663e

I like your claim

(\blockquote
Since I am so clearly wrong in your eye, I'd appreciate you writing
the _proper_ expression for taking the divergence of a rank two
tensor.
)

I explained to you how to do that

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.foundations/
msg/8ac5d4ef041f1f8a

and also explained to you why the number of Christoffels is *two* for
T_ab instead one how you *incorrectly* believed.

As already remarked this kind of basic stuff would be explained by your
teacher *not by me*.

But the more surprising point is that you do not show the more simple
sign of gratitude when your mistakes are corrected and you learn some
physics!

As a bonus remember also you did not know dimensional analysis

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/6fe7633a0e8130f8

Apply the comment you wrote to yourself.


--
Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)
http://canonicalscience.org
.