Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False

mluttgens@xxxxxxxxxx <mluttgens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
2b4a312a-74d6-4cf5-ac58-94223509430d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 26, 2:04 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
Seju Strich <Seju.Strich.2a93...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

Seju.Strich.2a93...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Bryan, read carefully... (keep your lips at rest for a moment so you can
understand this simple sophomore problem).

The 2.5 years in Kat's rest frame is EXACTLY EQUAL to a 2.5 year period
in my rest frame.

Forget about frames. They seem to confuse you.
Think (and talk) about clocks and how they are used to
measure the duration of some process.
For her trip, Kat measures 2.5 years on her clock.
For that same trip, you measure 5.0 years on your clock.
I don't see what is "exactly equal" about 2.5 and 5.0.


According to Earthling Vdm , Kat travels during
5 years, but will measure 5 * sqrt(1-0.866^2) =~ 2.5 years
on her clock.

But Kat considers herself at rest, the Earth moving at
0.866 c wrt to her.
After 5 years of her time (Kat is still alive, she
took a new drug), she claims that Dirk Vdm measured
only 2.5 years on his clock.

You are cheating - and you know it. You always cheat.

After 2.5 Kat-travel-years, she jumps to and staus in the
Earth restframe, in which 5 years had passed. And 2.5 of
her non-travel-years (and thus Earth-years) later, 7.5 Earth
years have passed.

Strich, you see what happens when a person refuses to
ask questions and decides to proclaim? They lose decades
of valuable time.

Dirk Vdm
.

Relevant Pages
Loading