sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Gravitational time dilation within shell
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravitational time dilation within shell
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Gravitational time dilation within shell
  • From: shalayka
• Re: Gravitational time dilation within shell
  • From: Androcles
• Gravitational time dilation within shell
  • From: shalayka
• [OT] Re: [Nike Knock-off URL deleted]
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: test
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is This a Subtle but Completely Legitimate Redefinition, Bewildering Magic or Paradox?
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Is This a Subtle but Completely Legitimate Redefinition,
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Is This a Subtle but Completely Legitimate Redefinition, Bewildering Magic or Paradox?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Is This a Subtle but [snip]
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Is This a Subtle but Completely Legitimate Redefinition, Bewildering Magic or Paradox?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is This a Subtle but Completely Legitimate Redefinition, Bewildering Magic or Paradox?
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: jem
• Re: Can time dilation be computed with just the Lorentz transformation and no other assumptions?
  • From: jem
• Discount Wholesale (WWW.NOTJUSTSNEAKERS.COM) Air Jordan Six Rings (6 IX Rings) men's sneakers
  • From: notjustsneakers
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Fos
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: jem
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: PD
• Re: Everyone needs to look at this one:
  • From: harry
• Easy way to learn English download latest materials
  • From: worldforever . suji
• Re: Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Genital Hair Removal
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: xxein
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: test
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Fos
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Hans . de . Vries . NL
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is This a Subtle but Completely Legitimate Redefinition,
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: [OT] FORTRAN Relativity; was Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Everyone needs to look at this one:
  • From: harry
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: luke . saul
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: luke . saul
• Re: Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• [OT] FORTRAN Relativity; was Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Spaceman
• Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Everyone needs to look at this one:
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: Special Relativity in the 21st century
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Hans . de . Vries . NL
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Hans . de . Vries . NL
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Can time dilation be computed with just the Lorentz transformation and no other assumptions?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Can time dilation be computed with just the Lorentz transformation and no other assumptions?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Special Relativity in the 21st century
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Darwin123
• Special Relativity in the 21st century
  • From: shuba
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Hans . de . Vries . NL
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: xxein
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Fos
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: SolomonW
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: jem
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Faster than Light?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: pmb
• Faster than Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Prior knowledge Fata Morgana Predictions refute Relativity !
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Akademia NOIA - Institute of new cosmology and the science of time
  • From: BorisPetrovic
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Fos
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: Raghar
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: harry
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Hans . de . Vries . NL
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: New nonsensical post by crackpot Eric
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: harry
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: thomheg
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: xxein
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: xxein
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: glird
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: Spaceman
• On the muliplication of negative numbers
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Eric Gisse's professional career as a shit-throwing chimpanzee will come to an abrupt end
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Nor
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Hans . de . Vries . NL
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Polarised sunglasses see black hole disks
  • From: alan . jon4
• Re: Eric Gisse's professional career as a shit-throwing chimpanzee will come to an abrupt end
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Eric Gisse's professional career as a shit-throwing chimpanzee will come to an abrupt end
  • From: shuba
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Cosmic Radiation knows where We are?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Cosmic Radiation knows where We are?
  • From: Test Ticler
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: greysky
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: greysky
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: greysky
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: test
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Jon Slaughter
• Re: new straw man by David
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: greysky
• Inertia and Spin. / My opinion./
  • From: socratus
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Inferior mathematics and science
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Hans . de . Vries . NL
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Inferior mathematics and science
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Hans . de . Vries . NL
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: test
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Inferior mathematics and science
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Hayek
• Inferior mathematics and science
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Hayek
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Nor
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Hayek
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Hayek
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Hayek
• Re: The ardency of Relativists is no more !
  • From: Triacon Tahedron
• The ardency of Relativists is no more !
  • From: Triacon Tahedron
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Jon Slaughter
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: greysky
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: glird
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: xxein
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Dono
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: Sue...
• The Barnes & Noble Effect
  • From: PD
• Prior knowledge Fata Morgana Predictions refute Relativity !
  • From: Triacon Tahedron
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: jem
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: PD
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Nor
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: They still can't account for the missing time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: new straw man by David
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: harry
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: harry
• Re: Einstein's Rigid Body
  • From: Androcles
• Re: new straw man by David
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Natural mathematics, strings, creation and eternity
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: new straw man by David
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: new straw man by David
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Prediction of Mathematical Beauty
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: They still can't account for the missing time
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Einstein's Rigid Body
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Dono
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Jerry
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: They still can't account for the missing time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: They still can't account for the missing time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: They still can't account for the missing time
  • From: Triacon Tahedron
• The Fossillity of our Teachers !
  • From: Triacon Tahedron
• Re: They still can't account for the missing time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein's Rigid Body
  • From: Igor
• Re: They still can't account for the missing time
  • From: Triacon Tahedron
• Re: The THEORY of Relativity is defective,
  • From: Igor
• Re: They still can't account for the missing time
  • From: Igor
• Re: new straw man by David
  • From: PD
• Re: They still can't account for the missing time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The THEORY of Relativity is defective,
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: They still can't account for the missing time
  • From: Triacon Tahedron
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: The THEORY of Relativity is defective,
  • From: Dono
• Re: Smiffy! Read this!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Prediction of Mathematical Beauty
  • From: Triacon Tahedron
• Re: They still can't account for the missing time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Dono
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Dono
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Dono
• They still can't account for the missing time
  • From: Triacon Tahedron
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Dono
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Einstein's Rigid Body
  • From: PD
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Dono
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rvallshg
• Smiffy! Read this!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein's Rigid Body
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Uncle Ben
• A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• The THEORY of Relativity is defective,
  • From: glird
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Rate of Fossil Fuel
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's Rigid Body
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: glird
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Einstein's Rigid Body
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Einstein's Rigid Body
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Nor
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: new straw man by David
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: harry
• Re: new straw man by David
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: new straw man by David
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: PD
• Re: new straw man by David
  • From: PD
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is magnetism real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: new straw man by David
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: new straw man by David
  • From: PD
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: PD
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: harry
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is magnetism real?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Time dilation pre-Einstein
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Hunting Season Supplier
  • From: rogerkolsson@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: harry
• Ajay Sharma kicked around
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Jerry
• Re: test
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: bill
• Re: Is magnetism real?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: new straw man by David
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Spacetime Physics, Page 290
  • From: Phil
• Re: Is magnetism real?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Spacetime Physics, Page 290
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is magnetism real?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Clues to avoid relativity: Signal velocity vs. group and phase velocities
  • From: Igor
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: xxein
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Dono
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: glird
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity and delusion
  • From: Greg Neill
• Relativity and delusion
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Spacetime Physics, Page 290
  • From: Phil
• Re: Message download speed
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spacetime Physics, Page 290
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: new straw man by David
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: new ad hominem and lie by dirk
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Clues to avoid relativity: Signal velocity vs. group and phase velocities
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Schrödinger's Universe
  • From: Phil
• Re: Message download speed
  • From: dlzc
• Re: new straw man by David
  • From: PD
• Re: Message download speed
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Schrödinger's Universe
  • From: fitz
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is magnetism real?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Message download speed
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: The Confusion is still There, Flat Learning Curve of Theory
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Clues to avoid relativity: Signal velocity vs. group and phase velocities
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is magnetism real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: BradGuth
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Nor
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Confusion is still There, Flat Learning Curve of Theory
  • From: Phil
• Re: Is magnetism real?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: new ad hominem and lie by dirk
  • From: Dono
• Foundation of Wave Mechanics, a paradox?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is magnetism real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spacetime Physics, Page 290
  • From: Phil
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• test
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Is magnetism real?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Confusion is still There, Flat Learning Curve of Theory
  • From: PD
• Re: new straw man by David
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: new straw man by dirk
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: jem
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: pmparker6
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Clues to avoid relativity: Signal velocity vs. group and phase velocities
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: kp
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: kp
• Re: Spacetime Physics, Page 290
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacetime Physics, Page 290
  • From: Phil
• Spacetime Physics, Page 290
  • From: Phil
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: xxein
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: PD
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Dono
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: glird
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: xxein
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: kp
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Rate of Fossil Fuel
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Can time dilation be computed with just the Lorentz transformation and no other assumptions?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Rate of Fossil Fuel
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Rate of Fossil Fuel
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: Dono
• Re: Rate of Fossil Fuel
  • From: Hayek
• Re: The Confusion is still There, Flat Learning Curve of Theory
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Rate of Fossil Fuel
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: harry
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: Dono
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: Shubee
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Nor
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: Dono
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Physics versus Mathematics
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: Dono
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: harry
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: kp
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Rate of Fossil Fuel
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Prediction of Mathematical Beauty
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Confusion is still There, Flat Learning Curve of Theory
  • From: JM Albuquerque
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Prediction of Mathematical Beauty
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: new ad hominem by Dono
  • From: Dono
• Re: Prediction of Mathematical Beauty
  • From: Triacon Tahedron
• Re: The Confusion is still There, Flat Learning Curve of Theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Triacon Tahedron
• Re: Prediction of Mathematical Beauty
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Confusion is still There, Flat Learning Curve of Theory
  • From: Triacon Tahedron
• Re: The Confusion is still There, Flat Learning Curve of Theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: kp
• The Confusion is still There, Flat Learning Curve of Theory
  • From: Triacon Tahedron
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Prediction of Mathematical Beauty
  • From: Triacon Tahedron
• Re: Prediction of Mathematical Beauty
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: new USENET guidelines (new principle)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Triacon Tahedron
• Re: join group
  • From: Triacon Tahedron
• join group
  • From: gnehagarg
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Steve Bell
• Prediction of Mathematical Beauty
  • From: triacontahedron
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: kp
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: kp
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: kp
• Re: new ad hominem by Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: new ad hominem by crackpot Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: kp
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Nor
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: get manual solution study guide
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Dono
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: new USENET guidelines (new principle)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: dlzc
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Dono
• Re: new USENET guidelines (was: massless or massive photon?)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Definition of "Ignorance"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Definition of "Ignorance"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Definition of "Ignorance"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Definition of "Ignorance"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Spaceman
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Dlo
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Sue...
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Dono
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Albertito
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
  • From: Albertito
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: tussock
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Correcting a Long-Standing Error in the Newton-Wigner Velocity Operator, and Solving the “Speed of Light Fermion Perplexity”
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: martin . muller1
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: xxein
• Re: W.W Sawyer passes away.......
  • From: xxein
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: new lie by Dono
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Why did Einstein say...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse and Uncle Al.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse and Uncle Al.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: new lie by Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: new lies and ad hominem by Tom Roberts
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse and Uncle Al.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Dono
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why did Einstein say...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why did Einstein say...
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Dono
• Re: Photon or Wave Transmission of Light?
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse and Uncle Al.
  • From: Dono
• Re: the ether back again?
  • From: Dono
• Re: W.W Sawyer passes away.......
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: WHY Time Dilation is Not Real
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Why did Einstein say...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse and Uncle Al.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: the ether back again?
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Photon or Wave Transmission of Light?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: lithium
• Re: Why did Einstein say...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Photon or Wave Transmission of Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: W.W Sawyer passes away.......
  • From: xxein
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: xxein
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why did Einstein say...
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Why did Einstein say...
  • From: Jim Black
• W.W Sawyer passes away.......
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: WHY Time Dilation is Not Real
  • From: Sue...
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: WHY Time Dilation is Not Real
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: "math" proof that the string breaks (according to SR)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: "math" proof that the string breaks (according to SR)
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "math" proof that the string breaks (according to SR)
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: "math" proof that the string breaks (according to SR)
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• How the UNITARY DIMENSIONAL MODEL is gotten, in the space-time-mass duration, by Romano Amodeo of the N.I.S.
  • From: amoram
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why did Einstein say... (was: Romano Amodeo needs help to disclose the PHYSICS UNIFICATION made by the New Italic School of Epistemology. His letter.)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse and Uncle Al.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Why did Einstein say... (was: Romano Amodeo needs help to disclose the PHYSICS UNIFICATION made by the New Italic School of Epistemology. His letter.)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Dono
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: PD
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Dono
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Albertito
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Spaceman
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Dlo
• Re: Photon or Wave Transmission of Light?
  • From: maxkeon
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: the ether back again?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: the ether back again?
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: PD
• "math" proof that the string breaks (according to SR)
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Why did Einstein say... (was: Romano Amodeo needs help to disclose the PHYSICS UNIFICATION made by the New Italic School of Epistemology. His letter.)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse and Uncle Al.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Photon or Wave Transmission of Light?
  • From: PD
• Re: WHY Time Dilation is Not Real
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse and Uncle Al.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse and Uncle Al.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse and Uncle Al.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Photon or Wave Transmission of Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: WHY Time Dilation is Not Real
  • From: Sue...
• Re: WHY Time Dilation is Not Real
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: coilforth
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: coilforth
• Re: Question about relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Question about relativity
  • From: coilforth
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• BELL'S PARADOX FOR DUMMIES
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: WHY Time Dilation is Not Real
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: PD
• Bell's Paradox for Dummies
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: Androcles
• Re: WHY Time Dilation is Not Real
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: WHY Time Dilation is Not Real
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: xxein
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: xxein
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: WHY Time Dilation is Not Real
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rvallshg
• WHY Time Dilation is Not Real
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: the ether back again?
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse and Uncle Al.
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Albertito
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Tom Roberts, Eric Gisse and Uncle Al.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: another new flame by crackpot Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: new USENET guidelines (was: massless or massive photon?)
  • From: Dono
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Dlo
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: PD
• Re: the ether back again?
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: the ether back again?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• the ether back again?
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: bill
• Re: Photon or Wave Transmission of Light?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Photon or Wave Transmission of Light?
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: PD
• Re: Photon or Wave Transmission of Light?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Photon or Wave Transmission of Light?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: bill
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: xxein
• Re: Test post (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental tests of "relativity".
  • From: glird
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Dono
• Re: new USENET guidelines (was: massless or massive photon?)
  • From: Dono
• Re: new USENET guidelines (was: massless or massive photon?)
  • From: Dono
• Re: new USENET guidelines (was: massless or massive photon?)
  • From: Dono
• Re: new USENET guidelines (was: massless or massive photon?)
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental tests of "relativity".
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Experimental tests of "relativity".
  • From: glird
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: PD
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: PD
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: PD
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: PD
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Albertito
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Experimental tests of "relativity".
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: maxwell
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ysy@mountain.net
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Albertito
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Dono
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: ysy@mountain.net
  • From: dlzc
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: As Feynman laughs from the other side
  • From: Dead Paul
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Albertito
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Dono
• ysy@mountain.net
  • From: Dlo
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Pmb
• "Gravity"
  • From: Dlo
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: new USENET guidelines (was: massless or massive photon?)
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: harry
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: SolomonW
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: bill
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: bill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Surfer
• Re: sSpacetime is a Non-local Entity?
  • From: shuba
• The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: bill
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: xxein
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• johnreed take 25 - Atomic Electromagnetic Field Structures
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Sun's trajectory in the inertial frame ECI of the GPS
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Experimental tests of "relativity".
  • From: Dono
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Experimental tests of "relativity".
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: kenseto
• As Feynman laughs from the other side
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: maxwell
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: Experimental tests of "relativity".
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Test post (kst)
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Peter M. Brown
• Re: Sun's trajectory in the inertial frame ECI of the GPS
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Sun's trajectory in the inertial frame ECI of the GPS
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Sun's trajectory in the inertial frame ECI of the GPS
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Raghar
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: xray4abc
• Sun's trajectory in the inertial frame ECI of the GPS
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: PD
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: PD
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: PD
• Re: Inaccurate QM Prediction
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Inaccurate QM Prediction
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: kenseto
• Don't believe in SR? Do you believe in magnetism?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: PD
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental tests of "relativity".
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Albertito
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Dlo
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: PD
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relativists can hear colored and invisible light in AM radios !!!
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: glhansen
• Re: Derivation of gravitational redshift from first principles proves GR is incorrect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Derivation of gravitational redshift from first principles proves GR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: PD
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: PD
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativists can hear colored and invisible light in AM radios !!!
  • From: Igor
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The church of relativity can't explain the deficit of time and space !!!
  • From: Igor
• Re: Derivation of gravitational redshift from first principles proves GR is incorrect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Derivation of gravitational redshift from first principles proves GR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: xxein1
• Re: Derivation of gravitational redshift from first principles proves GR is incorrect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Derivation of gravitational redshift from first principles proves GR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Greg Neill
• Test post (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Derivation of gravitational redshift from first principles proves GR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Inaccurate QM Prediction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Derivation of gravitational redshift from first principles proves GR is incorrect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Burger
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: Relativists can hear colored and invisible light in AM radios !!!
  • From: Burger
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Relativists can hear colored and invisible light in AM radios !!!
  • From: dlzc
• Relativists can hear colored and invisible light in AM radios !!!
  • From: Burger
• Re: Inaccurate QM Prediction
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: PD
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: PD
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: PD
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: PD
• Experimental tests of "relativity".
  • From: glird
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Dono
• Re: Derivation of gravitational redshift from first principles proves GR is incorrect
  • From: Dono
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Derivation of gravitational redshift from first principles proves GR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Rof
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Alen
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: rvallshg
• Derivation of gravitational redshift from first principles proves GR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: PD
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Why is SR still controversial?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Curious about the emission theory of light
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Dono
• Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Inaccurate QM Prediction
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Mitch Raemsch
• Re: Inaccurate QM Prediction
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Actual data for Sagnac?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time Dilation (Basic silly bull)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Actual data for Sagnac?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Actual data for Sagnac?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: xxein1
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Dono
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Actual data for Sagnac?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Dlo
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Actual data for Sagnac?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Inaccurate QM Prediction
  • From: kp
• Re: Inaccurate QM Prediction
  • From: kp
• Re: Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Inaccurate QM Prediction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• List of solutions manuals
  • From: BERGH
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dave Lang
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: PD
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Time Dilation (Basic silly bull)
  • From: PD
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Relativistic Dynamics
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dave Lang
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Inaccurate QM Prediction
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: a black hole
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: BURT
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dave Lang
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dave Lang
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Inaccurate QM Prediction
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Actual data for Sagnac?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Dilation (Basic silly bull)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Actual data for Sagnac?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Actual data for Sagnac?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Are SR effects real or not? Simplified case.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Dono
• Re: Actual data for Sagnac?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Actual data for Sagnac?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: a black hole
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Greg Neill
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Dlo
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: a black hole
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Inaccurate QM Prediction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Inaccurate QM Prediction
  • From: kp
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Inaccurate QM Prediction
  • From: Steve Bell
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Who coined the term "relativistic mass"?
  • From: Dono
• Re: a black hole
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: a black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: a black hole
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: a black hole
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Light has mass; That's smart
  • From: Mitch Raemsch
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Light has mass; That's smart
  • From: Mitch Raemsch
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: a black hole
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: a black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Light has mass; That's smart
  • From: Cosmik de Bris
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: a black hole
  • From: Mitch Raemsch
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: BURT
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: BURT
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: a black hole
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time Dilation (Basic silly bull)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time Dilation (Basic silly bull)
  • From: eratosthenes
• Re: Time Dilation (Basic silly bull)
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time Dilation (Basic silly bull)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• TRUE VALUE OF THE FINE STRUCTURE CONSTANT DISCOVERED
  • From: Jeff
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilatation, but no relativity of simultaneity or length contraction
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time Dilation (Basic silly bull)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Time Dilation (Basic silly bull)
  • From: eratosthenes
• Time dilatation, but no relativity of simultaneity or length contraction
  • From: blackhead
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: a black hole
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: a black hole
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: a black hole
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: a black hole
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Actual data for Sagnac?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• SR and possible Lorentz violations consistently coexist in Aristotle space-time
  • From: Surfer
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Actual data for Sagnac?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Dono
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Dlo
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Actual data for Sagnac?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Actual data for Sagnac?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Pmb
• Physics and Geometry. / My opinion./
  • From: socratus
• Re: Actual data for Sagnac?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Actual data for Sagnac?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: a black hole
  • From: Androcles
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Actual data for Sagnac?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: a black hole
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: a black hole
  • From: Androcles
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Reality
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Darwin123
• a black hole
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Reality
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reality
  • From: Dono
• Re: Reality
  • From: shuba
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: xxein1
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reality
  • From: dlzc
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The church of relativity can't explain the deficit of time and space !!!
  • From: PD
• Re: Reality
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Reality
  • From: glird
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Albertito
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gobbletygook; was Re: The "purification" in the E=mc^2...
  • From: amoram
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: marcofuics
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Dlo
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Albertito
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Dono
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Albertito
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Shubee
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: Pmb
• Re: massless charged particle
  • From: marcofuics
• massless charged particle
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The church of relativity can't explain the deficit of time and space !!!
  • From: PD
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: jem
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Sue...
• Derivation of Doppler frequency shift from first principles proves SR is incorrect
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativity Timelines
  • From: xxein1
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "purification" in the E=mc^2 will bring to c^2=9, and till to the Physics Unification and to the Atomic Fusion, how affirms the New Italic School, of Romano Amodeo
  • From: Dono
• Re: They force me to watch the sky and see UFO !!!
  • From: Igor
• Gobbletygook; was Re: The "purification" in the E=mc^2...
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The church of relativity can't explain the deficit of time and space !!!
  • From: Igor
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: xxein1
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The church of relativity can't explain the deficit of time and space !!!
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The Foldy-Wouthuysen Velocity Operator -- Is this Correct?
  • From: xxein1
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: PD
• Re: They force me to watch the sky and see UFO !!!
  • From: PD
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: PD
• Re: The Foldy-Wouthuysen Velocity Operator -- Is this Correct?
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: PD
• Re: The Foldy-Wouthuysen Velocity Operator -- Is this Correct?
  • From: kp
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: PD
• Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Dlo
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: jem
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: massless or massive photon?
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Stuart Ray
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The Foldy-Wouthuysen Velocity Operator -- Is this Correct?
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Stuart Ray
• Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Stuart Ray
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: PD
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: glird
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: harry
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: harry
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Greg Neill
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Dlo
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: jem
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: jem
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• massless or massive photon?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: They force me to watch the sky and see UFO !!!
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: jem
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: Imago Mortis
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Stuart Ray
• Relativity Timelines
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: xxein1
• Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: xxein1
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Stuart Ray
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PhD diplomas in relativity are to be called back !!!
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR and Magnetostatics?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: GR and Magnetostatics?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Dyson quote about PR (Was: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning)
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Dyson quote about PR (Was: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: GR and Magnetostatics?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR and Magnetostatics?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Shubee
• GR and Magnetostatics?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Stuart Ray
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: PD
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Shubee
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Dlo
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Information on sites and regulations
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Information on sites and regulations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Diagonalization in Minkowski space
  • From: Imago Mortis
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: harry
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Information on sites and regulations
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Information on sites and regulations
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Stuart Ray
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Information on sites and regulations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Information on sites and regulations
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: xxein1
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: jem
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Wen
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Stuart Ray
• Re: Basti Newsgroups (regulations)
  • From: Dono
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: jem
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New relativity - Curved space different from Accelerated space !!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PhD diplomas in relativity are to be called back !!!
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Where is the mathematical beauty of relativity !!!
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: New relativity - Curved space different from Accelerated space !!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Information on sites and regulations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Stuart Ray
• Information on sites and regulations
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Basti Newsgroups (regulations)
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: BURT
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: xxein1
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: BURT
• Re: Can the jerk Eric Gisse do high school math?
  • From: BURT
• Re: Can the jerk Eric Gisse do high school math?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Too bad for that lying psychopath Eric Gisse and his clone
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Can the jerk Eric Gisse do high school math?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Can the jerk Eric Gisse do high school math?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Can the jerk Eric Gisse do high school math?
  • From: Dono
• Can the jerk Eric Gisse do high school math?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: The Doppler Shift Equation For An Accelerating Frame of Reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Doppler Shift Equation For An Accelerating Frame of Reference
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Stuart Ray
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New relativity - Curved space different from Accelerated space !!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: alanmc95210@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity is a Mystery Science Theater 3000 !!!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The Doppler Shift Equation For An Accelerating Frame of Reference
  • From: Shubee
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Albertito
• Re: The Doppler Shift Equation For An Accelerating Frame of Reference
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Doppler Shift Equation For An Accelerating Frame of Reference
  • From: Shubee
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: jem
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: jem
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: Sue...
• "Creation of Universe and the Gravity Transformations"
  • From: Wen
• Are *observed* SR effects real?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: xxein1
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Old analysis of data in Miller's 1933 paper reveals absurdities.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: PD
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: They refuse to give me a cubic meter of curved space
  • From: xxein1
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Chubykalo and Vlaev's basic mistake
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: BURT
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: Shubee
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Bryan Olson
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Wen
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Wen
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: jem
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Albertito
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: They refuse to give me a cubic meter of curved space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Happy Fourth of July
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?
  • From: fjmr
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Happy Fourth of July
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: They refuse to give me a cubic meter of curved space
  • From: BURT
• Re: The Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Happy Fourth of July
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Uncertainty Principle
  • From: xxein1
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: New Newsgroups
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: They refuse to give me a cubic meter of curved space
  • From: xxein1
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Re: The Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The Uncertainty Principle
  • From: BURT
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: jem
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Finally once more, Special Relativity is Proven False by Seju Strich
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally once more, Special Relativity is Proven False by Seju Strich
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Finally once more, Special Relativity is Proven False by Seju Strich
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• New Newsgroups
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Igor
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Bryan Olson
• The Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Photon is the Evolutionary Driving Force of Everything
  • From: Bi Yu
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Albertito
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Albertito
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Androcles
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Albertito
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Dono
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Wen
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Finally once more, Special Relativity is Proven False by Seju Strich
  • From: Dono
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally once more, Special Relativity is Proven False by Seju Strich
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally once more, Special Relativity is Proven False by Seju Strich
  • From: PD
• Re: They refuse to give me a cubic meter of curved space
  • From: luke . saul
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False by Seju Strich
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Request for Review of a pre-print book titled, "Fundamental Nature of Matter and Fields"
  • From: PD
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: dominic . rice
• Re: (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: Androcles
• Re: (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: They refuse to give me a cubic meter of curved space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False by Seju Strich
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: They refuse to give me a cubic meter of curved space
  • From: xxein1
• Re: They refuse to give me a cubic meter of curved space
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Enhanced MOND from first principles
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cosmological horizons, and a sceptic's view of special and general relativity
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: milibar
• They refuse to give me a cubic meter of curved space
  • From: milibar
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: milibar
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: milibar
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: milibar
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: Dredd
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: BURT
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: Dredd
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: Dredd
• Re: Enhanced MOND from first principles
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Enhanced MOND from first principles
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Enhanced MOND from first principles
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Finally once more, Special Relativity is Proven False by Seju Strich
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Enhanced MOND from first principles
  • From: Dono
• Re: Enhanced MOND from first principles
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dono
• Enhanced MOND from first principles
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: Dono
• Comment on Field reality.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Finally again, Special Relativity Is Proven False by Seju Strich
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Muon hoaksy poaksy
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Big Picture of GR
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Darwin123
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Wen
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: PD
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: jem
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Finally again, Special Relativity Is Proven False by Seju Strich
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
  • From: harry
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False by Seju Strich
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What if: Romans see potential of Steam Power?
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False by Seju Strich
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Might Foldy-Wouthuysen Transformations contain a Hidden Fermion Mass Generation Mechanism?
  • From: Juan R.
• Finally again, Special Relativity Is Proven False by Seju Strich
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Constancy of Metres and Seconds
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: PD
• Re: (c+v+c-v)/2 = c
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: paparios@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Universal Velocity 1
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Might Foldy-Wouthuysen Transformations contain a Hidden Fermion Mass Generation Mechanism?
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Igor
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: xxein
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Igor
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: OG
• Re: Is vacuum not empty?
  • From: PD
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity predicts itself false !!!
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: rvallshg
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: OG
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: OG
• Re: Universal Velocity 1
  • From: xxein
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Dredd
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Dredd
• Re: Is an actual photon needed?
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: OG
• Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Space cannot possibly be curved under any circumstances, no way !!!
  • From: Dredd