Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
- From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 15:20:58 +0200
mluttgens@xxxxxxxxxx <mluttgens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
49c9cb05-8784-4dae-bc5a-faf07a495e42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 1, 7:44 am, Bryan Olson <fakeaddr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:mluttg...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:Try to solve this contradiction, without obfuscating
the subject with jumps.
"According to Earthling Vdm , Kat travels during
5 years, but will measure 5 * sqrt(1-0.866^2) =~ 2.5 years
on her clock.
According to SR, in the approximately-inertial rest frame
of Earth and Alpha Centauri, the events of Kat leaving
Earth and Kat arriving at Alpha Centauri are about 5 year
apart in time. In Kat's traveling frame, the two events
are about 2.5 years apart.
But Kat considers herself at rest, the Earth moving at
0.866 c wrt to her.
After 5 years of her time (Kat is still alive, she
took a new drug), she claims that Dirk Vdm measured
only 2.5 years on his clock."
If Kat continues in her away-from-Earth frame, after she
clocks five years she'll be twice as far from Earth as is
Alpha Centauri. In the frame of the Earth, Kat reaching
that point happens 10 years after Kat departed Earth.
You said "If Kat continues in her away-from-Earth frame,.."
But this is different from what I wrote:
"After 5 years of her time (Kat is still alive, she
took a new drug), she claims that Dirk Vdm measured
only 2.5 years on his clock."
The contradiction is obvious:
1) If B moves at v = 0.866 c relative to A, A claims that
to a time interval tA = 10 seconds measured on his/her
clock corresponds a time interval
tB = tA * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) =~ 5 seconds measured on B's
clock.
Thus, tA = 10 s, tB = 5 s.
Yes, retard, tB = tA / gamma,
only valid for 2 events with the same xB, i.o.w. on the clock
caried by B.
If B considers that A is moving at -0.866 c wrt to him/her,
B claims that to a time interval tB = 10 seconds measured
on his/her clock corresponds a time interval
tA = tB * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) = 5 seconds measured on A's
clock.
Then, tA = 5 s, tB = 10 s.
Yes, imbecile, tA = tB / gamma,
only valid for 2 events with the same xA, i.o.w. on the clock
caried by A.
How many zillions of times do you reckon that has been explained
to you?
Please face it, you don't have the brain power to understand
the meanings of the variables.
Get another hobby. IIRC some 5 or 6 years ago I recommendend
collecting poodle droppings. Have you tried it, bozo?
Dirk Vdm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
- From: Dono
- Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
- From: mluttgens
- Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
- References:
- Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
- From: Bryan Olson
- Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
- From: mluttgens
- Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
- Prev by Date: Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
- Next by Date: Re: New version of a relativity FAQ
- Previous by thread: Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
- Next by thread: Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|