Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 04:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 5, 7:13 am, mluttg...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[...]
If I drop my wrist watch from the top
of a ladder it stops ticking and is
correct twice a day. Without intervention
by a watchmaker the change is "permanent".
In complex number mathematics,to describe
physical phenomena reals and imaginaries
can often be freely interchanged without
regard to lexcical meaning.
Inertial frames of reference are imaginary
but they can be used to work out real
trajectories.
A suggestion:
Try to borrow some terms from a relevant
paper with adaquate mathmatical foundation
and examples so you don't have to invent
new terms.
Can you find some better terms here:
Proper Time
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node114.html
A NEW INTERPRETATION OF THE HAFELE-KEATING EXPERIMENT
http://www.shaping.ru/congress/english/spenser1/spencer1.asp
The Inertia of Twins
http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s4-07/4-07.htm
Sue...
.
- References:
- Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: mluttgens
- Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Prev by Date: "Creation of Universe and the Gravity Transformations"
- Next by Date: Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
- Previous by thread: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Next by thread: Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Index(es):
Loading