Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?

On Jul 7, 10:35 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The absence of an absolute and undetectable frame of reference is not
one of Einstein's postulates. Do you need the postulates reiterated
for you? Be sure you don't confuse a postulate from what you consider
an implication of a postulate; that would be the equivalent to
confusing an axiom with a theorem.

The original relativity theory of Poincaré and Lorentz most certainly
agreed with the constancy of light postulate and affirmed the
undetectability of any absolute frame of reference. Since the original
theory of relativity is self-consistent, the theorem in Einsteinian
relativity, wherever it came from, that there is no absolute frame of
reference, is either false or a hidden third metaphysical postulate.

Shubee
http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
    ... Be sure you don't confuse a postulate from what you consider ... I was referring to the original theory of relativity according to ... "He discussed the 'principle of relative motion' in two ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
    ... Be sure you don't confuse a postulate from what you consider ... The original relativity theory of Poincaré ... is either false or a hidden third metaphysical postulate. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Einsteins logic
    ... It is the second postulate ... > relativity has nothing to do with light. ... All your babbling about Einstein said this or Einstein ... > of MMX which relativists claim shows there is no ether. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Light Postulate Invalidated
    ... >> Eis an inertial observer, and entity Eis a light ray. ... A Physicist's Derivation of Special Relativity ... Then, the general form of the transformation equations will be derived, ... THE MAPPING POSTULATE ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
    ... The first postulate is sufficient to derive ... > special relativity with galilean relativity as a limiting ... I do not even endorse the idea of the classical Aether, ... Then I take it further to ask for the reason behind assuming that the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)