Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: PD <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 09:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 7, 10:13 am, Shubee <e.Shu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 7, 9:39 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'd be interested in your telling me how you think kinetic energy is
driven by the invariants of the geometry of spacetime.
Objects like kinetic energy, relativistic mass and 3-momentum, are
pretensors and therefore belong to the set of geometric invariants
that Klein had in mind.
Umm... no. Nice jargon-flinging, though. Might help if you had the
foggiest idea of the meaning of the terms when you fling them..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: jem
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Shubee
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- References:
- Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: mluttgens
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Shubee
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: PD
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Shubee
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Shubee
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: PD
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Shubee
- Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Prev by Date: Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
- Next by Date: Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Previous by thread: Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Next by thread: Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|