Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 08:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 7, 7:13 am, Shubee <e.Shu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 7, 9:39 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'd be interested in your telling me how you think kinetic energy is
driven by the invariants of the geometry of spacetime.
Objects like kinetic energy, relativistic mass and 3-momentum, are
pretensors and therefore belong to the set of geometric invariants
that Klein had in mind.
Kinetic energy, relativistic mass and 3-momentum are not invariants
and do not transform as tensors.
Shubeehttp://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf
.
- References:
- Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: mluttgens
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Shubee
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: PD
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Shubee
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Shubee
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: PD
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Shubee
- Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Prev by Date: Re: Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning
- Next by Date: Re: Diagonalization in Minkowski space
- Previous by thread: Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Next by thread: Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|