Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?

On Jul 7, 11:06 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 7, 10:13 am, Shubee <e.Shu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 7, 9:39 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'd be interested in your telling me how you think kinetic energy is
driven by the invariants of the geometry of spacetime.

Objects like kinetic energy, relativistic mass and 3-momentum, are
pretensors and therefore belong to the set of geometric invariants
that Klein had in mind.

Umm... no. Nice jargon-flinging, though. Might help if you had the
foggiest idea of the meaning of the terms when you fling them..

The most absolutely beautiful and general way to derive the equations
of relativistic mass and momentum conservation is with pretensors,
discovered by me while in graduate school. I certainly don't feel a
great need to publish my discovery because I believe I can apply it to
yet unsolved problems. If pretensors were only good to derive
relativistic mechanics, then they wouldn't be very important. I'm
following the advice given me by Wolfgang Rindler. "Never publish
anything that can be developed further because if you don't fully
develop and generalize your own work, someone else surely will."

Shubee
http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
    ... pretensors and therefore belong to the set of geometric invariants ... that Klein had in mind. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
    ... pretensors and therefore belong to the set of geometric invariants ... of relativistic mass and momentum conservation is with pretensors, ... great need to publish my discovery because I believe I can apply it to ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
    ... pretensors and therefore belong to the set of geometric invariants ... that Klein had in mind. ... "pretensors". ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)